Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 9;12(1):163. doi: 10.3390/cancers12010163

Table 2.

Review of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) pancreatic cancer clinical studies (2000–current).

Author Disease Sample Size Study Design Chemotherapy Total Dose (Gy) and Fractionation Acute Side Effects
Criteria for Adverse
Events Version
Late Side Effects MST Months
(Range)
1-year OS Rate 2-year OS Rate PFS FFLP Median FU Period Months
(Range)
Chang, et al. [22] Φ * Unresectable LAPC 77 Retrospective, single institute, combination of phase I and phase II studies. Variety of gemcitabine-based regimens 25 in 1 Grade ≥ 2 = 5%
NR
Grade ≥ 2 = 4%
Grade ≥ 3 = 9%
11.8 21% NR 1-year = 9% 1-year = 84% 6 (3–31)
Schellenberg, et al. [48] * LAPC 20 Prospective, phase II trial, single institute. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 weekly (days 1, 8, and 15) 25 in 1 Grade ≥ 2 = 15%
Grade 3 = 0%
V3 [90]
Grade ≥ 2 = 15%
Grade ≥ 3 = 5%
11.8 50% 20% Median time to progression was 9.2 months 1-year = 94% 2 patients remaining alive = 25.1–36.4 months
Schellenberg, et al. [41] * LAPC 16 Prospective, phase II, single institute. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 weekly (days 1, 8, and 15) 25 in 1 Grade 2 = 13%
Grade 3 = 6%
V3 [90]
Grade ≥ 2 = 33%
Grade ≥ 3 = 13%
11.4 50% Estimate 18% Median time to progression was 9.7 months. 1-year = 100% 9.1 (22.3 for living patients)
Hoyer, et al. [47] * Unresectable LAPC 22 Prospective, phase II, single institute. NR 45 in 3 Grade ≥ 2 = 100%
NR
Grade ≥ 2 = 94% 5.4 5% NR 1-year = 9%
Median time to progression
was 4.8 months.
Local control rate = 57% 14 days–18 months
Wild, et al. [91] * Recurrent 18 Reirradiation, retrospective, single institute. 5-fluorouracil-based regimen for 10 patients
Gemcitabine- based regimen for 7 patients
25, 20 or 27 in 5
After chemoradiation of 50.4 Gy in 27
Grade 2 = 28%
Grade 3 = 0%
NR
Grade 3 = 6% 8.8 NR NR Median = 3.7 months 1-year = 62% 34.3 (6.4–61.6)
Macchia, et al. [92] * Unresectable disease or recurrent 16 Prospective, phase I, single institute. Variety of chemotherapy regimens 20–35 in 4–7 Grade 1 = 50%
Grade 2 = 0%
NR
Grade 3 = 6.3% NR
Overall
response rate =56.2%
NR 50% 2-year distant progression free = 58.7% 2-year local progression free = 85.7% 24 (10–85)
Didolkar, et al. [39] * Unresectable LAPC 85 Retrospective, single institute. Variety of gemcitabine-based regimens post-SBRT 15–30 in 1–4 NR acute compared to late
Grade ≥ 3 = 22.3%
V2 [93]
18.6 50%
Median 1-year = 13.4 months
NR NR Local control = 91.7% NR
(25.8 months at last follow up)
Mahadevan, et al. [54] † LAPC 36 Retrospective, single institute. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 weekly (for 6 months) 24, 30 or 36 in 3 Grade 1 = 42%
Grade 2 = 25%
Grade 3 = 8%
NR
Grade ≥ 3 = 6% 14.3 NR NR Median = 9.6 months Local control = 78% 24 (12–33)
Mahadevan, et al. [3] † LAPC 39 Retrospective, single institute. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 weekly (for 6 months) 24 or 30 in 3 Grade 1 = 41%
Grade 2 = 23%
Grade 3 = 0%
V3 [90]
Grade 3 = 9% 20 NR NR Median = 15 months Local control = 85%
FFLP= 31%
21 (6–33)
Lominska, et al. [94] † LAPC 28 Reirradiation, retrospective, single institute. Variety of chemotherapy regimens 20–30 in 3–5
After 50.4 Gy XRT
Grade 2 = 4%
V3 [90]
Grade 3 = 7% 5.9 18% NR NR 1-year = 70% 5.9 (1–27)
Dagoglu, et al. [95] † Recurrent 30 Reirradiation, retrospective, single institute. Variety of chemotherapy regimens
Gemcitabine for 14 patients
FOLFOX for 6 patients
Erlotinib for 12 patients
None for 5 patients
24–36 in 3–5 Grade 3 = 11%
NR
Grade 3 = 7% 14 50% 5% 78% NR 11 (4–24)
Tozzi, et al. [44] † Unresectable LAPC = 21
Locally recurrent = 9
30 Prospective, single institute (consecutive enrolment). Variety of gemcitabine-based regimens 36–45 in 6 Grade 1 = 43%
Grade 2 = 10%
Grade 3= 0%
V3 [90]
Grade 3 = 0% 11 Median OS at 1-year = 47% NR Median PFS = 8 months 1-year = 96% (for 45 Gy group) and 85% for others 11.0 (2–28)
Gurka, et al. [96] † LAPC (with elective nodes) 10 Prospective, single institute, pilot trial. Concurrent gemcitabine with 1000 mg/m2 for 6 cycles 25 in 5 Grade 1 = 60%
Grade 3 = 0%
V3 [90]
Grade 2 = 0% 12.2 NR NR 6.8 months 1-year = 40% Until death
Koong, et al. [42] * LAPC 15 Prospective, single institute, phase I. Prior to enrolment 2 patients received conventional 5-FU–based chemoradiation to a dose of 50 Gy and 1 patient received chemotherapy alone. 15 (3 patients), 20 (5 patients), 25 (7 patients) in 1 Grade 1 = 13%
Grade 2 = 20%
Grade 3 = 0%
GI toxicities were scored according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group acute radiation morbidity criteria.
NR 11 NR NR Median time to progression = 2 months Local control = 75% 5
Koong, et al. [38] * LAPC 16 Prospective, single institute, phase II. Concurrent 5-fluorouracil 45 in 25 (IMRT) and 25 in 1 (SBRT) Grade 0= 18.7%
Grade 1= 43.7%
Grade 2= 25%
Grade 3= 12.5%
GI toxicities were scored according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group acute radiation morbidity criteria.
NR 8.3 15% NR Median time to progression = 4.38 months 1-year = 8%
Local control = 94%
5.75
Polistina, et al. [97] * Unresectable LAPC 33 Prospective, single institute. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 weekly (for 6 weeks) 30 in 3 Grade 1 = 21.7%
Grade 2 = 0%
V3 [90]
NR 10.6 39.1% 0% Median time to progression = 7.3 months 1-year = 82.6% 9
Rwigema, et al. [98] * LAPC (mix of metastatic (11%), unresectable (56%) and recurrent disease (16%)) 71 Retrospective, single institute. Variety of chemotherapy regimens 18–25 in 1–3 Grade 1 = 24%
Grade 2 = 11.3%
Grade 3 = 4.2%
NR
Grade 1 = 4.2% 10.3 months overall median OS 41% NR NR Overall 1-year = 48.5%
1-year = 38% for unresectable
1-year = 18.8% for recurrent group
1-year = 40% for metastatic group
12.7
(4–26)
Herman, et al. [55] * Unresectable LAPC 49 Prospective single-arm, multi-institutional, phase II. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 (3 doses) followed by a week break prior to SBRT 33 in 5 Grade ≥ 2 = 2%
V4 [99]
Grade ≥ 2 = 11% 13.9 (10.2–16.7) 59% 18% Median PFS = 7.8 months
1-year = 32%
2-year = 10%
1-year = 78% 13.9 (3.9–45.2)
Chuong, et al. [37] † (and *) Nonmetastatic LAPC (16 patients) and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (57)) 73 Retrospective, single institute. Induction gemcitabine-based
regimens delivered over 3 cycles followed by SBRT
35–50 in 5 Grade ≥ 3 = 0
V4 [99]
Grade ≥ 3 = 5.3% 15 (LAPC)
16.4 (borderline)
68.1% (LAPC)
72.2% borderline
NR Median PFS = 9.8 months
1-year PFS LAPC = 41%
1-year PFS borderline = 42.8%
1-year LC for non-surgical patients= 81% 10.5
(2.2–25.9)
Comito, et al. [40] * Unresectable LAPC 45 Prospective, observational, single-arm, single institute, phase II. 71% completed regimens 2 weeks prior to SBRT
19%
received gemcitabine-based regimens
45 in 6 Grade 1–2 = 49%
Grade ≥ 3 = 0%
V3 [90]
Grade 2 = 4%
Grade ≥ 3 = 0%
19 85% 33% Median PFS = 8 months Median FFLP = 26 months
1-year = 87%
2-year = 87%
13.5 months (6–48)
Gurka, et al. [36] * (and †) Borderline resectable and inoperable LAPC 38 Retrospective, single institute. Variety of gemcitabine-based regimens 25–30 (one patient received 15) in 5 Grade 2 = NR
Grade 3 = 5.2%
V3 [90]
Grade 3 = 5.2%
Grade 4 = 5.2%
Grade 5 = 5.2%
14.3 NR NR 9.2 months Local control rate = 79% NR
Mellon, et al. [46] * Borderline resectable and LAPC 159
(110 BRPC and 49 LAPC)
Retrospective, single institute. Variety of induction chemotherapy regimens 28–30 in 5 Grade1-2 = 52%
Grade 3 = 11%
V4 [99]
Grade 3 = 11% 19.2 (borderline)
15 (LAPC)
NR NR Event free survival = 11.9 months in borderline
and 13.2 in LAPC
1-year locoregional control = 78% 5.6
(2.1–15.4)
Pollom, et al. [43] * Unresectable (133), borderline resectable (11) pancreatic adenocarcinoma 167 Retrospective, single institute. Variety of induction chemotherapy regimens (82% were gemcitabine-based) 25 in 1 (76 patients)
25–45 in 5 (91 patients)
Single-fraction:
Grade ≥ 2 = 25%
Multi-fraction:
Grade ≥ 2 = 8.7%
V4 [99]
Single-fraction:
Grade ≥ 3 = 12.3%
Multi-fraction:
Grade ≥ 3 = 5.6%
13.6 Single-fraction= 30.8%
Multi- fraction= 34.9%
NR NR NR 7.9 (0.1–63.6)

GI: gastrointestinal, MST: median survival time, OS: overall survival, XRT: photon radiation therapy, FU: follow up, NR: not reported, LAPC: locally advanced pancreatic cancer, IMRT: intensity modulated radiation therapy. Φ: Includes 40 patients from Schellenberg, et al. [41], Koong, et al. [42] and Koong, et al. [38]. *: OS measured from diagnosis †: OS measured from start of SBRT.