Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Contraception. 2019 Oct 23;101(1):34–39. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.09.003

Table 3:

Estimated relative odds of unintended pregnancy from pre-mandate to post-mandate at the individual level, as estimated from the stratified unadjusted logistic regression analyses of the NSFG 2008–2010, 2013–2015 analytic sample (n=7,409) [OR (95% CI) presented]

Post-Mandate v. Pre-Mandate OR (95% CI)
Race/Ethnicity
 NH White/NH Other (unweighted n=4,027) 0.88 (0.57, 1.37)
 NH Black (unweighted n=1,618) 0.89 (0.57, 1.41)
 Hispanic (unweighted n=1,764) 0.82 (0.50, 1.34)
Insurance Status
 Private or Medi-Gap (unweighted n=3,960) 1.16 (0.70, 1.93)
 Government-sponsored** (unweighted n=1,874) 0.63 (0.41, 0.97)
 Single service, Indian Health Service, or uninsured (unweighted n=1,575) 0.76 (0.41, 1.39)
Relationship Status
 Married (unweighted n=2,272) 0.75 (0.44, 1.27)
 Unmarried (unweighted n=5,137) 0.96 (0.68, 1.36)

OR=Odds Ratio, CI=Confidence Interval, NH = Non-Hispanic

Model includes: Period

**

Includes Medicaid, Medicare, state-sponsored, CHIP, military (VA, CHAMPUS, TRICARE, CHAMP-VA), or other governmental