Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 30;5(5):2368–2377. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.9b03785

Table 3. Comparison of Maximum Adsorption Capacities of NiAlTi LDH for MO, OII, and TC with Different Adsorbents.

adsorbents adsorbates qmax (mg g–1) ref
banana peel MO 21.0 (25)
orange peel MO 20.0 (25)
deoiled soya MO 16.66 (26)
bottom ash MO 3.62 (26)
MgFe-LDO MO 104.27 (26)
MgAl-LDO MO 134.27 (27)
ZnAl-LDO MO 181.9 (28)
MgAl-LDH MO 169.11 (29)
Fe3O4/ZnCr-LDH MO 535.5 (22)
Au/ZnAl-LDO MO 627.51 (30)
NiAlTi LDH MO 1250 present study
Mg/Al LDH OII 224 (31)
calcined Mg/Al LDH OII 602 (31)
Mg/Al-NDH-NO3 OII 947.1 (32)
LDHs of compositions, Mg/Al, Cu/Al, Co/Al, Mg/Cu/Al, Co/Cu/Al, and Mg/Co/Al OII 59.2–129.8 (33)
acid and base-functionalized titanosilicate OII 98 and 49 (34)
activated carbon OII 329 (35)
mesoporous carbon CMK-3 OII 385 (35)
ammonia-tailored CMK-3 OII 596 (35)
zirconium-based chitosan microcomposite adsorbent OII 926 (36)
Mg/Al HT calcined OII 634.4 (37)
HT macro calcined OII 1521.2 (37)
LDH/PEG OII 625 (38)
NiAlTi LDH OII 2000 present study
activated sludge TC 72 (39)
montmorillonite TC 54 (40)
palygorskite TC 99 (41)
rectorite TC 140 (42)
CSLDO400 TC 195.31 (18)
NiAlTi LDH TC 238.09 present study