Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 13;22:15. doi: 10.1186/s12968-020-0601-0

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Axial images of CS (a) and conventional (b) CMRA. Both image sets were acquired from a 63-year-old patient. Both observers rated the image quality as excellent (4 points) for both techniques. CS largely shortened the acquisition time (2 min 6 s for CS, 10 min 0 s for conventional)