FIGURE 3:

Correlation between the average area of flow deficits (FDa) and the percentage of flow deficits (FD%) in the 1mm circles, 2.5 mm circles, and 5 mm circles from the 6×6 mm scans. The average area of flow deficits and the percentage of flow deficits are compared in the 6×6 mm scans for the 1 mm circles (A), 2.5 mm circles (B),and 5 mm circles (C) centered on the fovea. Pearson’s r correlations were 0.90, 0.89, and 0.89 for 1mm, 2.5mm, and 5mm circles, respectively.