Table 2.
Authors, year | Risk of bias within each domain | Overall risk of bias across studies | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Selection bias Random sequence generation |
Selection bias Allocation concealment |
Reporting bias Selective reporting |
Other bias Other sources of bias |
Performance bias Blinding (participants and personnel) |
Detection bias Blinding (outcome assessment) |
Attrition bias Incomplete outcome data |
||
Cottingham et al, 198830 | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | High | High | High | Low | High |
Levine et al, 199729 | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | High | High | Unclear | High |
Judgement: Bias is assessed as a judgment (high, low, or unclear) for individual elements from five domains (selection, performance, attrition, reporting, and other).
Assessment of risk of bias (version 5.1.0):
(Within a study) Low risk of bias: Low risk of bias for all key domains
Unclear risk of bias: Unclear risk of bias for one or more key domains
High risk of bias: High risk of bias for one or more key domains
(Across studies) Low risk of bias: Most information is from studies at low risk of bias
Unclear risk of bias: Most information is from studies at low or unclear risk of bias
High risk of bias: The proportion of information from studies at high risk of bias is sufficient to affect the interpretation of results