Table 5.
Multivariate analysis of factors associated with formal versus informal/community-based services, among women who accessed any service
| Model 1: Multivariate analysis of factors associated with formal services for IPV (n = 414) | Model 2: Multivariate analysis of factors associated with formal services for NPSV (n = 205) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude OR (95% CI) | AOR (95%CI) | Crude OR (95% CI) | AOR (95%CI) | |
| Conflict-related Violence | ||||
| Had a direct conflict experience | .6 (.3–1.3) | .6 (.3–1.3) | 2.7* (1.0–6.9) | 3.7* (1.0–13.3) |
| Violence Disclosure Factors | ||||
| Type of Violence | ||||
| (IPV) Sexual violence only/(NPSV) Other form of SV | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| (IPV) Physical violence only/(NPSV) Raped | 2.7(.9–7.5) | 3.6 * (1.2–10.6) | 1.2 (.5–2.6) | 1.3 (.6–3.3) |
| (IPV) Physical and sexual violence | 2.4 (.9–6.8) | 3.0* (1.0–8.5) | – | – |
| Have experienced controlling behaviours | .4* (.2–.9) | .3* (.1–.9) | – | – |
| Marital Characteristics | ||||
| Marriage was forced | .8 (.4–1.4) | .5* (.3–1.0) | – | – |
| Socio-demographics | ||||
| Income | ||||
| No income/humanitarian aid | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Own work | 1.0 (.5–2.0) | 1.1 (.5–2.4) | .3 (.1–1.0) | .4 (.1–2.4) |
| Husband | 1.8 (.9–3.5) | 3.2** (1.5–7.0) | .5 (.2–1.5) | 1.0 (.2–5.9) |
| Other | 1.4 (.7–2.7) | 2.4* (1.1–5.1) | .4 (.1–1.0) | 1.7 (.4–6.9) |
| Employment Status | ||||
| Not working | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Student | .4*(.2–1.0) | .4 (.1–1.3) | .2** (.1–.6) | .2** (0–.6) |
| Working | 2.2* (1.3–3.9) | 2.4* (1.2–5.1) | 1.6 (.7–3.6) | 3.6* (1–13.1) |
| Fuel Source | ||||
| Leaves/grass/wood | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Charcoal | .8 (.4–1.4) | .8 (.4–1.4) | 2.1 (1.0–4.8) | 3.3* (1.2–9.4) |
| Ever Married | 3.1 (.6–15.1) | 3.2 (.8–12.7) | 2.3* (1.2–4.6) | 3.4* (1.3–8.9) |
Note: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01; The final adjusted models were also controlled for the following socio-demographics in the final model: location, age, education, and housing type. The IPV model also included variables to account for fear of husband/partner, effect of IPV on wellbeing, injury, payment of brideprice and justification of violence which were not statistically significant. The NPSV model also included variables about the perpetrator of violence and attitudes towards rape which were not statistically significant. Standard errors were clustered at the boma/block level for all multivariate analysis