Skip to main content
. 2013 Jun 4;2013(6):CD004874. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004874.pub4

Comparison 2. Clarithromycin versus erythromycin.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Age below 5 years 1 260 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.93 [0.56, 1.55]
2 Cure rates 1 234 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.61 [0.84, 3.08]
3 Clinical success rate 1 234 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.92 [0.45, 8.23]
4 Failure rate 1 234 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.52 [0.12, 2.23]
5 Relapse rate 1 226 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.17 [0.02, 1.45]
6 Radiologic resolution 1 209 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.51 [1.02, 6.16]
7 Radiologic success 1 209 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 3.55 [0.70, 18.04]
8 Radiologic failure 1 209 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.34 [0.06, 1.80]
9 Adverse events 1 260 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.07 [0.60, 1.90]
10 Bacteriologic response 1 45 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.0 [0.15, 6.67]