Skip to main content
. 2005 Oct 19;2005(4):CD003187. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003187.pub2

Rome, HD 94.

Methods IF‐RT vs. EF‐RT; unconfounded; 1993 to 1995; single‐centre; late randomisation
Participants 130 (IF: 63, EF: 67); unfavourable stage II, favourable stage IIIA; age 16 to 74
Interventions EF: STNI; CT: 4 x ABVD
Outcomes CR, OS, RFS, EFS
Notes 79 patients could not be included because data were not obtained.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Allocation concealment? Low risk A ‐ Adequate