Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 10;8:e8480. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8480

Table 4. List of competing models explaining variation in juvenile Houston Toad growth.

Linear mixed-effects models were fit to repeated measures of Snout Urostyle Length of juvenile Houston Toads (Bufo [=Anaxyrus] houstonensis) maintained in terrestrial exclosures at Attwater Prairie Chicken National Wildlife Refuge. These data were collected from March–September, 2015. We examined the effect of RIFA suppression/treatment (i.e., prairies that were treated with insecticide and left untreated), initial/release density (four and six juvenile toads per exclosure), and time (i.e., week) on variation on SUL. We observed three models that had similar (Δ AICc ≤ 2) explanatory power with juvenile Houston Toad growth data. We report results from the model with the lowest AICc score which specified a higher order interaction of release density and time.

Model K AICc ΔAICc
SUL∼Density*Week+(Week—Exclosure/IndID) 11 5860.03 0.00
SUL∼Week+(Week—Exclosure/IndID) 9 5,860.964 0.934
SUL∼Treatment+Density*Week+ (Week—Exclosure/IndID) 12 5,861.989 1.959a

Notes.

a

K, Number of parameters; IndID, Individual ID of toad within an exclosure.