Comparison 8. Smoke alarm promotion versus control excluding interventions implemented by research assistants.

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Final smoke alarm ownership	8	1701	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	1.37 [1.02, 1.84]
2 Final functioning smoke alarms	8	2673	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	1.53 [1.05, 2.23]
3 Smoke alarms acquired	4	1083	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	2.98 [0.70, 12.74]
4 Functioning smoke alarms acquired	4	818	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	1.75 [0.99, 3.07]