Comparison 10. Smoke alarm promotion versus control without cluster adjustment.

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Final smoke alarm ownership	10	3316	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	1.22 [0.91, 1.63]
2 Final functioning smoke alarms	10	4017	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	1.34 [1.00, 1.79]
3 Smoke alarms acquired	5	2204	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	1.57 [0.73, 3.38]
4 Functioning smoke alarms acquired	5	1874	Odds Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI)	1.42 [1.01, 2.00]