Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 18;49(2):483–489. doi: 10.3906/sag-1807-160

Table 2.

The evaluation results of hantavirus positivity in samples using ELISA and WB.

Hantavirus
IgM ELISAn (%) P IgG ELISA n (%) P IgG WB n (%) P Totaln
Sex
Male 6 (7) 0.588 6 (7) 0.971 5 (6) 0.099 90
Female 5 (5) 7 (7) 1 (1) 103
Age distribution
18–45 7 (8) 0.212 4 (5) 0.356 1 (1) 0.239 83
46–70 4 (4) 9 (8) 5 (5) 110
Education status
Below middle school 6 (4) 0.342 10 (7) 0.796 5 (4) 1.000 136
Middle school 4 (9) 3 (7) 1 (2) 43
University 1 (7) 0 (0) 0 (0) 14
Monthly income level (TL)
<1500 8(6) 1.000 10 (7) 1.000 5 (3) 1.000 143
≥1500 3 (6) 3 (6) 1 (2) 50
Job groups
Farmer 6 (4) 0.064 8 (6) 0.591 3 (2) 0.306 136
Laborer 1 (3) 3 (9) 2 (6) 32
Civil servant 4 (16) 2 (8) 1 (4) 25
House structure
Reinforced concrete 8 (7) 0.854 9 (7) 0.573 5 (4) 0.078 122
Wooden 3 (5) 3 (5) 0 (0) 62
Mud-brick 0 (0) 1 (11) 1 (11) 9
Working in forestry
Yes 7 (6) 0.918 8 (7) 0.989 5 (4) 0.412 120
No 4 (6) 5 (7) 1 (1) 73
Total 11 (6) 13 (7) 6 (3) 193