Table 2.
Risk-of-Bias Table
| Citation | Selection Bias | Performance Bias: Blinding of Participants and Personnel | Detection Bias | Attrition Bias: Incomplete Outcome Data | Reporting Bias: Selective Reporting | ||
| Random Sequence Generation | Allocation Concealment | Blinding of Outcome Assessment: Self-Reported Outcomes | Blinding of Outcome Assessment: Objective Outcomes | ||||
| Low Vision Rehabilitation Services | |||||||
| Coulmont et al. (2013) | – | – | – | – | N/A | + | + |
| Goldstein et al. (2015) | – | – | – | – | N/A | – | + |
| Pearce et al. (2011) | ? | ? | + | – | N/A | + | + |
| Renieri et al. (2013) | – | – | – | – | N/A | – | + |
| Ryan et al. (2013) | – | – | – | – | N/A | ? | + |
| Stelmack et al. (2012) | ? | ? | – | + | N/A | – | + |
| Self-Management Approach | |||||||
| Alma et al. (2012) | – | – | – | – | N/A | – | + |
| Rees et al. (2015) | + | + | + | + | N/A | + | + |
| Rovner et al. (2013) | + | + | + | + | N/A | + | + |
| Rovner et al. (2014) | + | + | + | + | N/A | + | + |
| Tay et al. (2014) | – | – | – | – | N/A | + | + |
| Whitson et al. (2013) | – | – | – | – | N/A | + | + |
| Tango | |||||||
| Hackney et al. (2013) | – | – | – | – | N/A | + | + |
| Hackney et al. (2015) | – | – | – | – | N/A | + | + |
Note. Categories for risk of bias are as follows: + = low risk of bias; ? = unclear risk of bias; – = high risk of bias. N/A = not applicable because no objective outcome measures were used. Risk-of-bias table format adapted from “Assessing Risk of Bias in Included Studies,” by J. P. T. Higgins, D. G. Altman, and J. A. C. Sterne, in Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Version 5.1.0), by J. P. T. Higgins and S. Green (Eds.), 2011, London: Cochrane Collaboration. Retrieved from http://handbook-5-1.cochrane.org. Copyright © 2011 by The Cochrane Collaboration.
Suggested citation: Liu, C.-j., & Chang, M. C. (2020). Interventions within the scope of occupational therapy to improve performance of daily activities for older adults with low vision: A systematic review (Table 2). American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 74, 7401185010. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.2019.038372