Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 2;236(3):425–433. doi: 10.1111/joa.13118

Table 1.

Procrustes anova for sources of shape variation in a subsample of re‐digitized 28 subjects [9 with BCLA, 5 with BCLP, and 14 without clefts (NORM)].

Shape variation            
Effect Explained SS SS MS df F P
Group 8.63% 0.027916 0.000436 64 1.27 0.080
Sex 4.03% 0.013026 0.000407 32 1.19 0.221
Individual 81.38% 0.263234 0.000343 768 15.73 < 0.001
Measurement error 5.82% 0.018829 0.000022 864 1.53 0.070
Residual 0.14% 0.000457 0.000014 32    
Total 100.00% 0.323463        

df, degrees of freedom; F, F statistics; MS, mean squares; P, P‐value; SS, sum of squares.