Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 4;4(1):45–60. doi: 10.1007/s41669-019-0157-9

Table 4.

Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), costs (US dollars, 2016) and cost-effectiveness estimated over 24 months of follow-up (ANRS 12169 2LADY, n = 451)

TDF/FTC LPV/r (arm A, n = 152)
Mean (95% CI)
ABC ddI LPV/r (arm B, n = 145)
Mean (95% CI)
TDF/FTC DRV/r (arm C, n = 154)
Mean (95% CI)
Difference or ICER
ABC ddI LPV/r vs TDF/FTC LPV/r
Mean (95% CI)
Difference or ICER
TDF/FTC DRV/r vs TDF/FTC LPV/r
Mean (95% CI)
Base-case analysis
ARV drugs prices observed during 2016a
 Total costs per patient (USD)
  Burkina Fasof 1085 (1056–1104) 1496 (1367–1584) 1573 (1529–1604) 410 (280–505) 488 (439–532)
  Cameroong 1352 (1308–1396) 1884 (1804–1961) 1820 (1760–1873) 532 (441–621) 468 (395–538)
  Senegalh 1461 (1396–1511) 2183 (2103–2258) 2008 (1751–2216) 721 (626–819) 546 (283–764)
 QALYs per patientb
  Burkina Fasof 1.098 (1.003–1.192) 1.119 (0.989–1.232) 1.126 (1.030–1.218) 0.021 (− 0.140 to 0.169) 0.028 (− 0.107 to 0.162)
  Cameroong 1.037 (0.978–1.095) 1.060 (1.000–1.117) 0.964 (0.909–1.020) 0.023 (− 0.060 to 0.106) − 0.073 (− 0.153 to 0.008)
  Senegalh 1.201 (1.078–1.309) 1.063 (0.920–1.207) 1.022 (0.853–1.177) − 0.138 (− 0.319 to 0.049) − 0.179 (− 0.381 to 0.018)
 ICER (∆Costs/∆QALYs)
  Burkina Fasof ICER = 19,674* ICER = 17,693*
  Cameroong ICER = 23,470* Arm A Dominantc*
  Senegalh Arm A Dominantc* Arm A Dominantc*
Scenario 1 (2018 MSF prices of ARVd)
 Total costs per patient (USD)
  Burkina Fasof 1036 (1008–1053) 1457 (1333–1542) 1503 (1462–1533) 421 (294–512) 468 (422–509)
  Cameroong 1247 (1209–1282) 1752 (1686–1807) 1698 (1645–1741) 505 (431–573) 451 (388–509)
  Senegalh 1403 (1338–1453) 1988 (1949–2026) 1806 (1576–1993) 585 (520–659) 402 (168–602)
 QALYs per patient
  Burkina Fasof 1.098 (1.003–1.192) 1.119 (0.989–1.232) 1.126 (1.030–1.218) 0.021 (− 0.140 to 0.169) 0.028 (− 0.107 to 0.162)
  Cameroong 1.037 (0.978–1.095) 1.060 (1.000–1.117) 0.964 (0.909–1.020) 0.023 (− 0.060 to 0.106) − 0.073 (− 0.153 to 0.008)
  Senegalh 1.201 (1.078–1.309) 1.063 (0.920–1.207) 1.022 (0.853–1.177) − 0.138 (− 0.319 to 0.049) − 0.179 (− 0.381 to 0.018)
 ICER (∆Costs/∆QALYs)
  Burkina Fasof ICER = 21,050* ICER = 17,682*
  Cameroong ICER = 23,198* Arm A Dominantc*
  Senegalh Arm A Dominantc* Arm A Dominantc*
Scenario 2 (LYS)
 Total costs per patient (USD)
  Burkina Fasof 1085 (1056–1104) 1496 (1367–1584) 1573 (1529–1604) 410 (280–504) 488 (439–532)
  Cameroong 1352 (1308–1396) 1884 (1804–1961) 1820 (1760–1873) 532 (441–621) 468 (395–538)
  Senegalh 1461 (1396–1511) 2183 (2103–2258) 2008 (1751–2216) 721 (626–819) 546 (283–764)
 LYS per patient
  Burkina Fasof 1.898 (1.820–1.944) 1.823 (1.657–1.930) 1.921 (1.888–1.939) − 0.075 (− 0.249 to 0.064) 0.023 (− 0.038 to 0.107)
  Cameroong 1.882 (1.825–1.928) 1.892 (1.823–1.946) 1.901 (1.842–1.945) 0.009 (− 0.073 to 0.088) 0.018 (− 0.058 to 0.093)
  Senegalh 1.908 (1.802–1.968) 1.956 (1.935–1.971) 1.791 (1.551–1.959) 0.048 (− 0.020 to 0.159) − 0.117 (− 0.361 to 0.092)
 ICER (∆Costs/∆LYS)
  Burkina Fasof Arm A Dominantc* ICER = 21,048*
  Cameroong ICER = 56,450* ICER = 25,729*
  Senegalh ICER = 15,018* Arm A Dominantc*
Scenario 3 (QALYse)
 Total costs per patient (USD)
  Burkina Fasof 1085 (1056–1104) 1496 (1367–1584) 1573 (1529–1604) 410 (280–505) 488 (439–532)
  Cameroong 1352 (1308–1396) 1884 (1804–1961) 1820 (1760–1873) 532 (441–621) 468 (395–538)
  Senegalh 1461 (1396–1511) 2183 (2103–2258) 2008 (1751–2216) 721 (626–819) 546 (283–764)
 QALYs per patient
  Burkina Fasof 1.611 (1.534–1.678) 1.581 (1.428–1.692) 1.632 (1.571–1.688) − 0.030 (− 0.196 to 0.108) 0.021 (− 0.070 to 0.117)
  Cameroong 1.564 (1.508–1.613) 1.584 (1.521–1636) 1.534 (1.480–1.582) 0.020 (− 0.059 to 0.097) − 0.030 (− 0.103 to 0.044)
  Senegalh 1.670 (1.556–1.753) 1.613 (1.525–1.699) 1.511 (1.301–1.675) − 0.057 (− 0.182 to 0.084) − 0.159 (− 0.386 to 0.041)
 ICER (∆Costs/∆QALYs)
  Burkina Fasof Arm A Dominantc* ICER = 23,358*
  Cameroong ICER = 26,716* Arm A Dominantc*
  Senegalh Arm A Dominantc* Arm A Dominantc*
Scenario 4a (discount rate of 0%)
 Total costs per patient (USD)
  Burkina Fasof 1100 (1069–1119) 1516 (1386–1607) 1596 (1551–1628) 417 (284–513) 496 (447–541)
  Cameroong 1369 (1324–1415) 1911 (1829–1989) 1846 (1785–1900) 542 (449–632) 477 (402–548)
  Senegalh 1479 (1412–1531) 2214 (2131–2290) 2035 (1773–2248) 735 (636–834) 556 (288–781)
 QALYs per patient
  Burkina Fasof 1.118 (1.020–1.214) 1.139 (1.005–1.254) 1.146 (1.048–1.239) 0.0214 (− 0.143 to 0.174) 0.0282 (− 0.110 to 0.164)
  Cameroong 1.056 (0.995–1.115) 1.079 (1.019–1.138) 0.981 (0.925–1.038) 0.0236 (− 0.061 to 0.109) − 0.0743 (− 0.156 to 0.008)
  Senegalh 1.223 (1.098–1.333) 1.082 (0.937–1.227) 1.040 (0.867–1.198) − 0.1409 (− 0.324 to 0.051) − 0.1826 (− 0.390 to 0.020)
 ICER (∆Costs/∆QALYs)
  Burkina Fasof ICER = 19,465* ICER = 17,615*
  Cameroong ICER = 22,963* Arm A Dominantc*
  Senegalh Arm A Dominantc* Arm A Dominantc*
Scenario 4b (discount rate of 6%)
 Total costs per patient (USD)
  Burkina Fasof 1076 (1047–1094) 1482 (1354–1569) 1558 (1515–1589) 406 (275–499) 482 (434–526)
  Cameroong 1340 (1297–1384) 1866 (1787–1942) 1803 (1744–1855) 526 (436–613) 463 (390–531)
  Senegalh 1449 (1386–1498) 2162 (2082–2236) 1989 (1735–2197) 713 (617–809) 540 (278–755)
 QALYs per patient
  Burkina Fasof 1.085 (0.991–1.178) 1.106 (0.976–1.217) 1.113 (1.018–1.203) 0.0205 (− 0.139 to 0.168) 0.0272 (− 0.105 to 0.157)
  Cameroong 1.025 (0.966–1.082) 1.047 (0.988–1.104) 0.952 (0.898–1.007) 0.0221 (− 0.059 to 0.105) − 0.0723 (− 0.151 to 0.008)
  Senegalh 1.186 (1.066–1.294) 1.050 (0.910–1.193) 1.009 (0.843–1.164) − 0.1364 (− 0.317 to 0.050) − 0.1767 (− 0.376 to 0.018)
 ICER (∆Costs/∆QALYs)
  Burkina Fasof ICER = 19,823* ICER = 17,750*
  Cameroong ICER = 23,834* Arm A Dominantc*
  Senegalh Arm A Dominantc* Arm A Dominantc*

ABC ddI LPV/r abacavir + didanosine + lopinavir/ritonavir, ARV antiretroviral drugs, CI confidence interval, ICER incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, LYS life-year saved, MSF Médecins Sans Frontières, QALYs quality-adjusted life-years, TDF/FTC DRV/r tenofovir/emtricitabine + darunavir/ritonavir, TDF/FTC LPV/r tenofovir/emtricitabine + lopinavir/ritonavir, USD United States dollars, ∆ difference

*The probability of arm A being cost-effective at one times the country’s per capita gross domestic product is 100%

aUnit prices of antiretroviral drugs for the year 2016 (obtained from the WHO Global Price Reporting Mechanism database)

bEstimates of utilities were obtained from the DART trial [16]

cDominance means significant lower costs and higher QALYs

dUnit prices of antiretroviral drugs for the year 2018 (obtained from the Médecins Sans Frontières report [30]

eEstimates of utilities were obtained from Tengs and Lin [31]

fn = 90 (30 in arm A, 28 in arm B and 32 in arm C)

gn = 302 (101 in arm A, 99 in arm B and 102 in arm C)

hn = 59 (21 in arm A, 18 in arm B and 20 in arm C)