Skip to main content
. 2019 Jun 28;4(1):37–44. doi: 10.1007/s41669-019-0156-x

Table 1.

Summary of validation analysis results for clinical trials selected for the Fifth Mount Hood Diabetes Challenge

Diabetes model Coefficient of determination (absolute risk) Coefficient of determination (risk differencea) Endpoints predicted by model (total = 45)
CDS 0.637 0.442 18
IMS CORE 0.496 0.113 34
MICHIGAN 0.212 0.041 23
ECHO-T2DM 0.519 0.325 33
UKPDS-OM1 0.616 0.290 21
UKPDS RE 0.733b 0.665b 4
CDC-RTI 0.724b 0.212 20
CARDIFF 0.536 0.034 15
EBMI 0.134 0.418 17

CARDIFF Cardiff Research Consortium Model, CDC-RTI Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-RTI Diabetes Cost-effectiveness Model, CDS Cornerstone Diabetes Simulation, EBMI Evidence-Based Medicine Integrator Simulator, ECHO-T2DM Economics and Health Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Model, IMS CORE IMS CORE Diabetes Model, MICHIGAN Michigan Model for Diabetes, UKPDS-OM1 United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Outcomes Model, UKPDS RE United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Risk Engine

aRisk difference is defined as the absolute risk of a given outcome in the control arm minus that in the intervention arm

bDenotes a model with a higher coefficient of determination than the CDS model