Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 16;16(5):815–826. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.37275

Table 1.

Correlation of ITGA1 with clinicopathological features, stages and colorectal neoplasms markers of colorectal cancer

Group Number of cases Concentration μg/mL t/F value p value
Serum 39.3/5.93
Healthy subjects 50 1.79±0.43 <0.0001
CRC patients 100 4.19±1.82
Gender 1.072/1.363
Male 27 4.56±1.99 0.177
Female 73 3.60±1.45
Age 0.634/-
40-49 20 4.73±2.44 0.596
50-59 33 4.30±1.70
60-69 22 4.49±1.74
70- 25 3.47±1.55
Diagnosis 1.849/0.903
Rectal cancer 40 3.80±1.38 0.370
Colon cancer 60 4.41±2.18
TNM staging 5.56/-
I + II 24 2.82±0.81 <0.0001
III + IV 76 4.71±1.91
Duke's staging 2.5/-
A 16 3.08±0.81 0.067
B 19 4.03±1.93
C 22 3.27±1.19
D 43 5.19±2.14
CEA 1.765/1.251
Positive 66 4.50±2.04 0.215
Negative 34 3.60±1.25
CA125 1.215/0.155
Positive 56 3.10±1.27 0.877
Negative 44 4.14±1.59
CA199 4.772/2.339
Positive 67 4.76±2.05 0.022
Negative 33 3.10±0.97
Tumor metastasis 1.062/0.980
Yes 55 4.49±2.02 0.331
No 45 3.80±1.42

Note: Data represented the mean ± SD analyzed by Student's t-test using SPSS. CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CA199, carbohydrate antigen 199; CA125, carbohydrate antigen 125; t/F value, the statistical values of the F-test and t-test, respectively.