Skip to main content
. 2019 Dec 21;9(1):31. doi: 10.3390/jcm9010031

Table 1.

Participant characteristics by case–control status a.

Characteristics Cases b (LDKTs) n = 672 Controls b (DDKTs) n = 565 Chi2 Comparing Cases and Controls
Sex Male 382 (57) 322 (57) p = 0.95
Female 279 (42) 235 (42)
Missing 11 (2) 8 (1)
Age (years) 20–29 47 (7) 27 (5) p = 0.39
30–39 80 (12) 57 (10)
40–49 106 (16) 102 (18)
50–59 178 (27) 153 (27)
60–69 167 (25) 132 (23)
>70 77 (12) 79 (14)
Missing 17 (3) 15 (3)
Ethnicity White 581 (87) 445 (79) p = 0.005
Asian 38 (6) 41 (7)
Black/African/Caribbean 19 (3) 39 (7)
Mixed/Multiple 5 (0.7) 5 (0.9)
Other 10 (2) 14 (3)
Missing 19 (3) 21 (4)
Religion No religion 191 (28) 144 (26) p = 0.01
Christian 402 (60) 315 (56)
Muslim 10 (2) 11 (2)
Other religions c 37 (6) 56 (10)
Missing 22 (3) 39 (7)
Highest level of education No formal education/Primary school 10 (2) 20 (4) p = 0.03
Secondary school 202 (30) 191 (34)
Vocational/Technical 171 (26) 143 (25)
University-undergraduate 145 (22) 98 (17)
University-postgraduate 73 (11) 46 (8)
Other 33 (5) 24 (4)
Missing 38 (6) 43 (8)

a The three participants for whom transplant type/case–control status was missing are excluded from this table. b Percentages may not total 100% due to figures being presented to the nearest whole number. c Hindu, Jewish, Sikh, Buddhist and Other combined due to single participant responders in some groups risking identification.