Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 2;12(1):126. doi: 10.3390/nu12010126

Table 2.

Study design and characteristic of selected randomized controlled trial (RCT) on the impact of macronutrient distribution on sleep quality.

Citation Study Design Country Population n Age [mean, SD] (y) BMI [mean, SD] Control Intervention Intervention Duration Sleep Evaluation Quality Assessment Score
Lindseth et al., 2013 [41] Double-blind Crossover USA Healthy 44 20.6 (2.0) 24.8 (3.5) 35% FAT 50% CHO 15% PRO High-FAT
(56% FAT, 22% CHO,
22% PRO)
High-CHO
(22% FAT, 56% CHO,
22% PRO)
High-PRO
(22% FAT, 22% CHO,
56% PRO)
4 days (2-wk washout) SL, SE% 12
Karl et al., 2015 [42] Block USA Healthy 39 21.0 (3.7) 25.0 (3.7) 31% FAT 55% CHO 14% PRO Moderate-PRO
[30% FAT, 43%CHO, 27%PRO]
High-PRO
[30%FAT, 28%CHO, 42%PRO]
*40% energy deficit
21 days SL 7
Lindseth & Murray, 2016 [18] Crossover USA Healthy 36 20.9 (1.9) 24.6 (4.1) 35% FAT
50% CHO
15% PRO)
High-FAT
(65% FAT, 25% CHO,
10% PRO)
High-CHO
(10% FAT, 80% CHO, 10% PRO)
High-PRO
(15% FAT, 40% CHO,
45% PRO)
4 days (2-wk washout) Sleep duration (Nocturnal), PSQI, SL, SE% 12
Zhou et al., 2016 [17] Crossover USA Overweight/Obese 14 56.0 (3.0) 30.9 (0.6) 25% FAT
65% CHO
10% PRO
Moderate-PRO
(25% FAT, 55% CHO,
20% PRO)
High-PRO
(25% FAT, 45% CHO,
30% PRO)
*750kcal energy deficit
4 weeks Sleep duration
(Nocturnal), PSQI
10
Average Score 10.3

BMI (body mass index); CHO (dietary carbohydrate), FAT (dietary fat); PRO (dietary protein); PSQI (Pittsburgh sleep quality index); SL (sleep latency); SE% (sleep efficiency). *Intervention diet included an energy deficit from the subjects’ normal diet.