Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 17;9(1):249. doi: 10.3390/jcm9010249

Table 3.

Quantitative analysis of articles included in the systematic review.

Author/Year Study Tipe N Sex/Mean Age/Losses T (Months) Periodontal Complications PEDro Jadad
PPD PAL PCR BOP
Sailer I. et al. 2017 RCT 62
−22 MC
−40 ZR
22 f/24 m
56 y
7 l
60 ZR 2.5 ± 0.4 mm
MC 2.6 ± 0.4 mm
ZR 0.0 ± 0.2 mm
MC 0.0 ± 0.2 mm
ZR 13.8 ± 24.5%
MC 12.9 ±17.8%
ZR 32.8 ± 26.7%
MC 29.8 ± 24%
8 3
Sailer I. et al. 2009 RCT 58
−24 MC
−34 ZR
22 f/25 m
54.4 ± 12.7 y
6 l
40 ZR 2.4 ± 0.3 mm
MC 2.4 ± 0.3 mm
ZR 2.5 ± 0.2 mm
MC 2.3 ± 0.2 mm
ZR: 0.1 ± 0.1
MC: 0.1 ± 0.1
ZR: 0.3 ± 0.2
MC: 0.3 ± 0.2
8 3
Molin M. et al. 2008 PCT 57
-Control (untreated teeth)
12 f/6 m
57 y
0 l
60 - - No differences regarding control group. No differences regarding control group. 3 1
Zenthöfer A. et al. 2015 RCT 19
−10 ZR
−9 MC
11 f/8 m
56 y
2 l
36 No differences regarding ZR or MC crowns. No differences regarding ZR or MC crowns. No differences regarding ZR or MC crowns. No differences regarding ZR or MC crowns. 9 5
Reitemeier B. et al. 2002 PCT 480
-Control (untreated teeth)
160 f/80 m
42.3 ± 3 y
0 l
12 - - Greater amount of plaque in control teeth. Crowned teeth subgingival double probability bleeding before supragingival.
No differences regarding control group.
6 3
Sax C. et al. 2011 PCT 85
-Control (untreated teeth)
9 f/12 m
48.3 ± 10 y
16 l
120 - Test 0.7 mm
Control 0.46 mm
- - 3 1
Ioannidis A. et al. 2016 PCT 171
-Control (Ramfjorf teeth)
31 f/22 m
52.6 ± 10 y
2 l
120 - - No differences. Greater gingival bleeding in crowned teeth. 3 1
Suarez MJ. et al.2018 RCT 120
−60 MC
−60 ZR
-Control (untreated teeth)
23f/17 m
24–70 y
0 l
60 - Greater amount of PAL in MC and ZR compared to the control group. Greater amount of plaque in MC and ZR versus control group. Greater gingival bleeding in MC with respect to ZR.
Greater bleeding MC and ZR versus control teeth.
9 5
Peláez J et al. 2012 PCT 60
-Control (untreated teeth)
11 f/6 m
23–65 y
0 l
36 1.17 ± 0.45 3.07± 0.73 0.53 ± 0.55 0.89 ± 0.59 4 1
Nicolaisen MH. et al. 2016 RCT 102
51 MC
51 ZR
21f/12 m
51 y
0 l
36 Increase of 0.1 mm MC and 0.2 mm ZR (initial <4 mm) Increase of 0.9 ± 1.2 mm MC (initial 1.8 mm)
Increase of 0.7 ± 0.8 mm ZR (initial 1.7 mm)
- - 9 5
Setz J. et al. 1994 PCT 12
-Control (untreated teeth)
- 6 Significant differences with higher PPD in treated teeth versus control. - - - 10 5
Tanner J. et al. 2018 ReCT 40
-Control (untreated teeth)
19 f/8 m
64.6 y
8 l
67 23% > 5 mm test
5% > 5 mm control
- Average plaque index
0.2 test
0.6 control.
38.1% test 13.9% control. 2 1
Hἀff A. et al. 2014 ReCT 118
-Control (dientes no tratados)
24f/6 m
68 ± 11 y
26 l
156 - - 13% control
8.3% test
8.3% control
8.3% test
2 1
Ohlmann B. et al. 2014 RCT 111
37 MC (control)
36 PC
38 PC + F
37 f/29 m
46 y
9 l
48 - - MC 0.40 ± 0.75
PC 0.56 ± 0.73
PC + F 0.63 ± 0.76
MC 0.35 ± 0.59
PC 0.56 ± 0.81
PC + F 0.35 ± 0.59
8 3
Naenni N. et al. 2015 RCT 108
54 ZR
54 LD
25 f/11 m
52.3 y
4 l
36 No differences regarding groups. - Greater amount of plaque in LD. No differences regarding groups. 9 5
Weishaupt P. et al. 2007 RCT 68 34
-
18 l
24 - - T1: 0.43 ± 0.66
T2: 0.6 ± 0,83
T1: 0.61 ± 0.74
T2: 0.60 ± 0.83
9 5
Peláez J. et al. 2012 PCT 120
60 MC
60 ZR
22 f/15 m
23–65 y
0 l
48 - Marginal integrity:
85% Zirconia
75% MC
No differences regarding groups. No differences regarding groups. 9 5
Valderhaug J. 1993 PCT 187 55
-
156 l
180 57% 2 mm
34% 4 o > mm
43.7% changes in level of insertion. 27% 15 years later. 63% subgingivals crowns. 6 3
Valdergaug J 1976 PCT 380 98
40–60 y
16 l
60 83% 2 mm 36.7% changes in level of insertion. No differences. 69% subgingivals crowns. 6 3
Müller HP. 1986 PCT 47 5
-
0 l
12 Supragingival: 1.75 ± 0.4 mm
Juxtagingival: 1.65 ± 0.34
12% 3 mm o >
Supragingival: +0.13 ± 0.36
Juxtagingival: −0.05 ± 0.38
Supragingival: 0.34 ± 0.42
Juxtagingival: 0.15± 0.24
74% sin placa
Supragingival: 0.17 ± 0.27
Juxtagingival: 0.60 ± 0.42
74% without bleeding.
6 3