Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 11;13(1):80–91. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2020.80-91

Table-1.

Summary of meta-analysis results.

S. No. Study Total number of studies Total number of samples Number of positive samples Meta-analysis results

Model Proportion 95% CI I2 (%) Tau2 Relative weightage range (%) p value
1 Babesiosis 11 1238 73 Random 0.06 (0.03; 0.12) 77 1.07 4.1-10.5 <0.01
2 Bluetongue 11 2762 917 Random 0.28 (0.21; 0.36) 95 0.383 7.5-9.6 <0.01
3 Foot-and-mouth disease 39 41,009 9260 Random 0.21 (0.18; 0.24) 98 0.368 2.2-2.6 0
4 Peste des petits ruminants 23 5221 1192 Random 0.15 (0.09; 0.25) 94 1.61 3.7-4.7 <0.01
5 Porcine cysticercosis 13 4810 314 Random 0.06 (0.04; 0.09) 88 0.753 5.8-8.8 <0.01
6 Theileriosis 8 1468 418 Random 0.26 (0.21; 0.32) 74 0.114 2.5-15.5 <0.01
7 Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome 41 91,904 1929 Random 0.01 (0.00; 0.02) 97 3.522 0.8-2.6 <0.01
8 Brucellosis bovine 14 54,056 5190 Random 0.17 (0.08; 0.29) 99 0.065 6.7-7.2 <0.01
9 Brucellosis caprine 2 1164 28 Random 0.02 (0.02; 0.04) 0 0 7.2-92.8 0.44
10 Brucellosis porcine 2 448 68 Random 0.18 (0.00; 0.99) 99 13.36 49.9-50.1 <0.01
11 Brucellosis sheep and goat 4 1129 31 Random 0.03 (0.02; 0.04) 0 0 16.2-32.5 0.59
12 Porcine circovirus 38 2808 1345 Random 0.43 (0.28; 0.60) 94 4.253 1.9-2.9 <0.01
13 Classical swine fever 10 1323 431 Random 0.31 (0.18; 0.47) 95 1.088 5.6-11.1 <0.01

CI=Confidence interval