Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 14;20:69. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-1967-8

Table 3.

Correlations between motor proficiency composites (standard scores) and mathematical and reading outcomes (standard scores) for total sample

Fine manual control Manual coordination Body coordination Strength and agility Total motor composite
Mathematics composite (n = 55) rs = .572 (<.001)* r = .399 (.003) rs = .296 (.028) r = .389 (.003) r = .466 (<.001)*
Maths reasoning (n = 55) rs = .587 (<.001)* r = .382 (.004) rs = .264 (.051) r = .354 (.008) r = .448 (.001)*
Numerical operations (n = 55) rs = .472 (<.001)* r = .382 (.004) rs = .264 (.051) r = .387 (.004) r = .439 (.001)*
Reading composite (n = 54) rs = .476 (.001)* rs = .299 (.028) rs = .142 (.307) rs = .180 (.193) rs = .316 (.020)
Pseudoword decoding (n = 54) rs = .438 (.001)* rs = .296 (.030) rs = .194 (.159) rs = .195 (.158) rs = .344 (.011)
Word reading (n = 55) rs = .521 (<.001)* r = .319 (.017) rs = .154 (.263) r = .215 (.115) r = .362 (.007)
Reading comprehension (n = 54) rs = .395 (.003) r = .284 (.037) rs = .029 (.832) r = .144 (.298) r = .270 (.048)

Spearman’s rho (rs) and Pearson’s (r) correlation coefficients are reported as appropriate

*p ≤ .05 (significant correlations after conducting Bonferroni correction at α = 0.05 / 35 = 0.0014)