Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 14;20:69. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-1967-8

Table 4.

Correlations between motor proficiency subtests (scale scores) and mathematical and reading outcomes (standard scores) for total sample

Fine motor precision Fine motor integration Manual dexterity Upper limb coordination Bilateral coordination Balance Running speed and agility Strength
Mathematics composite (n = 55) rs = .449 (.001)* rs = .525 (<.001)* rs = .391 (.003) r = .274 (.043) rs = .361 (.007) r = .231 (.090) r = .387 (.004) r = .291 (.031)
Maths reasoning (n = 55) rs = .449 (.001)* rs = .530 (<.001)* rs = .436 (.001)* r = .233 (.087) rs = .331 (.013) r = .224 (.100) r = .365 (.006) r = .256 (.059)
Numerical operations (n = 55) rs = .357 (.007) rs = .461 (<.001)* rs = .306 (.023) r = .296 (.028) rs = .331 (.014) r = .217 (.111) r = .380 (.004) r = .293 (.030)
Reading composite (n = 54) rs = .368 (.006) rs = .470 (<.001)* rs = .254 (.064) rs = .289 (.034) rs = .259 (.058) rs = .163 (.240) rs = .252 (.065) rs = .162 (.241)
Pseudoword decoding (n = 54) rs = .311 (.022) rs = .459 (<.001)* rs = .250 (.069) rs = .279 (.041) rs = .353 (.009) rs = .156 (.261) rs = .251 (.068) rs = .188 (.174)
Word reading (n = 55) rs = .395 (.003) rs = .512 (<.001)* rs = .210 (.123) r = .301 (.026) rs = .221 (.104) r = .235 (.084) r = .269 (.047) r = .122 (.375)
Reading comprehension (n = 54) rs = .301 (.027) rs = .391 (.004) rs = .245 (.074) r = .214 (.120) rs = .141 (.308) r = .174 (.209) r = .200 (.147) r = .078 (.576)

Spearman’s rho (rs) and Pearson’s (r) correlation coefficients are reported as appropriate

*p ≤ .05 (significant correlations after conducting Bonferroni correction at α = 0.05 / 56 ≈ 0.001)