Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 14;20:69. doi: 10.1186/s12887-020-1967-8

Table 5.

Proportions of variance in (i) mathematical performance of Year 1 students that could be explained by fine motor precision and fine motor integration subtests, beyond that accounted for by age; (ii) reading performance of Year 1 students that could be explained by fine motor precision and fine motor integration subtests, beyond that accounted for by age

R R2 F, (df), p Adj R2 ΔR2 ΔF, (df), p B, [95% CI], SE B β t, p
Mathematics
Step 1 .327 .107 6.37, (1, 53), <.015 .090 .107 6.37, (1, 53), .015 181.35, [112.49, 250.22], 34.34 5.28, <.001
Age -12.77, [-22.92, -2.62], 5.06 -.327 -2.52, .015
Step 2 .503 .253 8.82, (2, 52), .001 .225 .146 10.18, (1, 52), .002 145.97, [78.58, 213.36], 33.58 4.35, <.001
Age -10.72, [-20.19, -1.25], 4.72 -.275  -2.27, .027
Fine motor precision 1.57, [0.58, 2.56], 0.49 .386 3.19, .002
Step 3 .589 .347 9.03, (3, 51), <.001 .309 .094 7.31, (1, 51), .009 124.19, [58.50, 189.88], 32.72 3.80, <.001
Age -8.65, [-17.72, 0.43], 4.52 -.222  -1.91, .061
Fine motor precision 0.39, [-0.89, 1.67], 0.64 .096 0.61, .544
Fine motor integration 1.50, [0.39, 2.61], 0.55 .430 2.70, .009
Reading
Step 1 .202 .041 2.21, (1, 52), .143 .022 .041 2.21, (1, 52), .143 162.04, [75.40, 248.68], 43.18 3.75, <.001
Age -9.43, [-22.16, 3.30], 6.34 -.202 -1.49, .143
Step 2 .387 .150 4.50, (2, 51), .016 .117 .109 6.56, (1, 51), .013 124.47, [36.98, 211.97], 43.58 2.86, .006
Age -6.82, [-19.10, 5.46], 6.12 -.146 -1.12, .270
Fine motor precision 1.45, [0.31, 2.59], 0.57 .335 2.56, .013
Step 3 .502 .252 5.60, (3, 50), .002 .207 .102 6.79, (1, 50), .012 109.41, [25.65, 193.18], 41.71 2.62, .012
Age -5.81, [-17.47, 5.86], 5.81 -.124  -1.00, .322
Fine motor precision 0.10, [-1.40, 1.60], 0.75 .022 0.13, .898
Fine motor integration 1.68, [0.39, 2.98], 0.65 .450 2.61, .012

Unstandardised (B) and standardised (β) regression coefficients; significant p-values (p < .05) in bold