Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 11;8:e8499. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8499

Table 3. Performances of the four models with different combinations of predictive variables in the derivation and validation cohorts.

Variables Clinical model Clinical-pathological model Clinical-medication model Full model
Age 0.998
Pathological grade 1.270* 1.300*
Cystatin C 2.728* 2.731* 2.305* 2.663*
eGFR 0.970* 0.972* 0.233 0.973
BNP 1.059* 1.057* 1.476 1.055*
Log urinary ACR (mg/g) 1.077* 1.066* 1.517* 1.066
RASB use 0.841* 0.768
C-statistics
Derivation cohort 0.864 0.865 0.842 0.866
Validation cohort 0.870 0.876 0.849 0.875
Hosmer-Lemeshow test P 0.558 0.909 0.418 0.623
AIC 332.73 332.53 354.44 336.17

Notes.

ACR
Albumin-to-creatinine ratio
eGFR
Estimated glomerular filtration rate
RASB
renin-angiotensin system blocker
AIC
Akaike information criterion
*

statistically significant at P < 0.05.