Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 10;12:941–956. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S187203

Table 2.

Comparison of treatment response between CSM-TACE group and cTACE group

Items M1 M3 M6
CSM-TACE group cTACE group P-value CSM-TACE group cTACE group P-value CSM-TACE group cTACE group P-value
Number of assessed patients 107 124 82 55 54 45
 CR 13 (12.1) 10 (8.1) 0.301 16 (19.5) 3 (5.5) 0.020 9 (16.7) 3 (6.7) 0.129
 PR 64 (59.8) 48 (38.7) 0.001 47 (57.3) 22 (40.0) 0.047 29 (53.7) 18 (40.0) 0.174
 SD 19 (17.8) 50 (40.3) <0.001 5 (6.1) 21 (38.1) <0.001 10 (18.5) 15 (33.3) 0.091
 PD 11 (10.3) 16 (12.9) 0.536 14 (17.1) 9 (16.4) 0.913 6 (11.1) 9 (20.0) 0.219
 ORR 77 (71.9) 58 (46.8) <0.001 63 (76.8) 25 (45.5) <0.001 38 (70.4) 21 (46.7) 0.017
 DCR 96 (89.7) 108 (87.1) 0.536 68 (82.9) 46 (83.6) 0.913 48 (88.9) 36 (80.0) 0.219
Number of assessed nodules 179 211 131 91 86 77
 CR 30 (16.8) 26 (12.3) 0.213 32 (24.4) 12 (13.2) 0.039 23 (26.7) 15 (19.5) 0.274
 PR 31 (17.3) 23 (10.9) 0.067 22 (16.8) 12 (13.2) 0.463 34 (39.5) 24 (31.2) 0.265
 SD 87 (48.6) 99 (46.9) 0.740 62 (47.3) 41 (45.1) 0.738 29 (33.8) 38 (49.4) 0.043
 PD 31 (17.3) 63 (29.9) 0.004 15 (11.5) 26 (28.5) 0.001 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
 ORR 61 (34.1) 49 (23.2) 0.018 54 (41.2) 24 (26.4) 0.023 57 (66.2) 39 (50.6) 0.043
 DCR 148 (82.7) 148 (70.1) 0.004 116 (88.5) 65 (71.5) 0.001 86 (100.0) 77 (100.0)

Notes: Data was presented as count (%). Comparison between two groups was determined by Chi-square test. P-value <0.05 was considered significant, and the significant results were shown in boldface. “–” indicated that the data was unable to be compared due to lack of events.

Abbreviations: CSM-TACE, transarterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres® microspheres; cTACE, conventional transarterial chemo-embolization; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; PD, progression disease; ORR, objective response rate; DCR, disease control rate.