Table 1.
Method | Antimicrobial | MIC (mg/L) | Interpretationa | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Single susceptibility testing | ||||
Vitek-2® | ||||
amoxicillin/clavulanic acid | ≥32 | resistant | ||
cefotaxime | ≥64 | resistant | ||
ceftazidime | ≥64 | resistant | ||
cefoxitin | ≥64 | resistant | ||
ciprofloxacin | ≥4 | resistant | ||
trimethoprim/ sulfamethoxazole | ≥320 | resistant | ||
gentamicin | ≥16 | resistant | ||
imipenem | ≥16 | resistant | ||
meropenem | ≥16 | resistant | ||
nitrofurantoin | 256 | resistant | ||
piperacillin/tazobactam | ≥128 | resistant | ||
tobramycin | ≥16 | resistant | ||
Gradient test | ||||
amikacin | >256 | resistant | ||
aztreonam | >256 | resistant | ||
ceftazidime/avibactam | >256 | resistant | ||
ceftolozane/tazobactam | >256 | resistant | ||
doripenem | >32 | resistant | ||
eravacycline | 4 | resistant | ||
fosfomycin | >256 | resistant | ||
imipenem | >32 | resistant | ||
meropenem | >32 | resistant | ||
plazomicin | >256 | unknown | ||
sulbactam | >256 | unknown | ||
tigecycline | 6 | resistant | ||
Broth microdilution | ||||
colistin | 16 | resistant | ||
| ||||
MIC mg/L |
||||
Antimicrobial | single | combined with aztreonam | Interpretationb | |
| ||||
Gradient test superposition | ||||
amoxicillin/clavulanic acid | >256 | 12 | synergy | |
ceftazidime/avibactam | >256 | 0.5 | synergy | |
ceftolozane/tazobactam | >256 | 48 | synergy | |
colistin | 8 | 12 | no synergy | |
meropenem | >32 | 16 | synergy | |
piperacillin/tazobactam | >256 | 32 | synergy |
According to EUCAST (www.eucast.org).
Synergy was defined as the occurrence of an inhibition zone when an antimicrobial was combined with aztreonam.