Table 2.
Concurrent | Lagged | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Fixed effects | Est | SE | Est | SE |
Memory failures β0it | ||||
Intercept (γ00) | −.01 | .02 | .01 | .02 |
Age (γ01) | −.02 | .03 | −.02 | .02 |
Gender (γ02) | .06* | .02 | .04 | .02 |
Education (γ03) | −.01 | .03 | .01 | .02 |
Income (γ04) | .04 | .03 | .04 | .02 |
Health burden (γ05) | .08** | .03 | .07** | .02 |
Social media β1it | ||||
Intercept (γ10) | .06*** | .02 | .09*** | .02 |
Age × Media (γ11) | −.02 | .02 | .01 | .03 |
Age2 × Media (γ11) | .03 | .02 | −.03 | .02 |
Stressors β2it | ||||
Intercept (γ20) | .17*** | .01 | .10*** | .01 |
Previous day memory failures β3it | ||||
Intercept (γ30) | — | — | .16*** | .02 |
Random effects | ||||
Memory Failures (τ00) | .37 | .24 | ||
Within-Person Fluctuation (σ2) | .52 | .55 | ||
R2 between-person | 21% | 47% | ||
R2 within-person | 18% | 24% |
Note: Est = estimate. R2 variance explained at the within-person and between-person levels were calculated using the Snijders and Bosker (2012) technique.