Figure 4. Deconditioning-update is based on memory destabilization mechanisms.
(A) Experimental design: rats were fear-conditioned with five tone-shock pairings (context A; 5CS+US, 0.5mA). 48 hr later, the no-footshock and footshock groups underwent a single extinction session (context B, 24 CSs), followed by test (context B), renewal (context A) and spontaneous recovery (context B) sessions. (B) Freezing levels during extinction. Weak footshocks impaired extinction within the session and in the test session (C), but not in renewal (D) or spontaneous recovery (E). (F) Experimental design: rats were fear-conditioned (context A; 5CS+US, 0.5mA). 48 hr later, all animals underwent daily reactivation sessions (context B), receiving nimodipine (16 mg/kg, i.p.) or vehicle 30 min before each one. They then underwent test (context B), renewal (context A) and spontaneous recovery (context B) sessions. Nimodipine prevented freezing decrease across reactivation sessions in both groups (G). Freezing was similar between groups in the test session (H), but was lower in the vehicle-footshock group in the renewal (I) and spontaneous recovery (J) sessions. Bars represent mean ± SEM. Statistical comparisons are performed using two-way repeated-measures ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-hoc (extinction), one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey post-hoc (test, renewal, and spontaneous recovery following extinction), three-way repeated-measures ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-hoc (reactivation sessions with nimodipine/vehicle) and two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post-hoc (test, renewal, and spontaneous recovery following nimopidine/vehicle). *p<0.05; **p<0.005; ***p<0.0005; ****p<0.0001 in between-group comparisons. For full statistics, see Supplementary file 4. For pre-CS freezing, see Supplementary file 14.