Table 3.
Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wald | Wald | Wald | ||||||||||
Predictors | OR | 95% CI | Χ 2 | p | OR | 95% CI | Χ 2 | p | OR | 95% CI | Χ 2 | p |
Odor identification | 0.59 | 0.51–0.69 | 48.58 | <.001 | 0.59 | 0.51–0.68 | 53.12 | <.001 | 0.58 | 0.51–0.68 | 53.64 | <.001 |
Age* | 20.79 | <001 | 31.06 | <.001 | 28.74 | <.001 | ||||||
66 | 1.82 | 1.04–3.19 | 4.34 | .037 | 1.69 | 0.99–2.88 | 3.64 | .057 | 1.66 | 0.97–2.85 | 3.64 | .057 |
72 | 1.72 | 0.92–3.22 | 2.68 | .101 | 1.55 | 0.86–2.79 | 2.12 | .146 | 1.51 | 0.83–2.72 | 2.22 | .136 |
78 | 3.95 | 1.99–7.84 | 14.45 | <.001 | 3.79 | 2.06–6.97 | 18.24 | <.001 | 3.56 | 1.92–6.58 | 17.47 | <.001 |
>80 | 4.72 | 2.20-0.11 | 15.21 | <.001 | 5.05 | 2.55–9.97 | 21.71 | <.001 | 4.56 | 2.29–9.07 | 19.98 | <.001 |
Current smoking | 1.92 | 1.12–3.29 | 5.44 | .020 | 1.89 | 1.12–3.20 | 5.60 | .018 | 1.92 | 1.13–3.24 | 5.87 | .015 |
Atrial fibrillation | 2.07 | 1.15–3.75 | 5.93 | .015 | 1.89 | 1.06–3.37 | 4.72 | .030 | 1.95 | 1.09–3.47 | 5.07 | .024 |
Cerebrovascular disease | 2.35 | 1.02–5.39 | 3.94 | .047 | 2.42 | 1.06–5.55 | 4.37 | .037 | 2.39 | 1.05–5.44 | 4.26 | .039 |
APOE (ε4 carrier) | 1.58 | 1.04–2.39 | 4.25 | .039 | 1.53 | 1.01–2.30 | 4.05 | .044 | 1.54 | 1.02–2.33 | 4.23 | .040 |
Episodic memory | 0.96 | 0.91–1.02 | 2.36 | .124 | 0.93 | 0.86–1.00 | 4.03 | .045 | ||||
Perceptual speed | 0.99 | 0.95–1.04 | 0.80 | .371 | ||||||||
MMSE | 0.83 | 0.66–1.04 | 2.57 | .109 | ||||||||
Physical inactivity | 1.38 | 0.86–2.23 | 1.84 | .175 | ||||||||
Head trauma | 1.40 | 0.82–2.38 | 1.49 | .222 | ||||||||
Hypertension | 0.66 | 0.44–1.00 | 3.81 | .051 | ||||||||
Complex leisure activity | 0.96 | 0.86–1.08 | 0.33 | .569 | ||||||||
Social network index | 1.00 | 0.63–1.57 | 0.00 | .973 |
Note: CI = Confidence interval; MMSE = Mini-Mental State examination; OD = Olfactory dysfunction; OR = Odds ratio.
*Reference category: 60 years. The −2 log likelihood was 682.3 for model 1, 697.9 for model 2 and 693.94 for model 3. Nagelkerke’s R2 was 0.23 for model 1, 0.21 for model 2 and 0.21 for model 3. Results from the Hosmer–Lemeshow goodness of fit: Χ 2 = 2.37, p = .967 for model 1, Χ 2 = 7.10, p = .526 for model 2 and Χ 2 = 6.08, p = .638 for model 3.