Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 14;11:895. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14647-9

Table 1.

CryoEM data collection, refinement, and validation statistics.

ImmZIKV-Fab DV62.6 complex [SPA] (EMDB-0932) (PDB 6LNT) ImmZIKV (EMDB-0933) (PDB 6LNU) ImmZIKV-Fab DV62.5 complex [StA] (EMDB-0933)
Data collection and processing
 Magnification 47,000 59,000 47,000
 Voltage (kV) 300 300 300
 Electron exposure (e–/Å2) 18 18 90
 Defocus range (μm) −0.5 to −3.5 −0.5 to −3.5 −3 to −4
 Pixel size (Å) 1.71 1.34 1.71
 Symmetry imposed I I C1
 Initial particle images (no.) 84,924 79,701 1934
 Final particle images (no.) 19,295 7,922 1152
 Map resolution (Å) 8 9 13
FSC threshold 0.143
 Map resolution range (Å) ≥8 ≥9 ≥13
Refinement
 Initial model used (PDB code) 4B03, 5AZE, 4JZN 4B03 NA

 Model resolution (Å)

FSC threshold 0.5

9.1 9.4 NA
 Model resolution range (Å) ≥9.1 ≥9.4 NA
 Map sharpening B factor (Å2) −900 −912
Model composition NA
 Non-hydrogen atoms 2642 1998
 Protein residues 2642 1998
 Ligands - -
B factors (Å2) NA NA NA
 Protein
 Ligand
R.m.s. deviations NA NA NA
 Bond lengths (Å)
 Bond angles (°)
 Validation NA
 MolProbity score 2.15 1.94
 Clashscore 2.27 1.00
 Poor rotamers (%) NA NA
 Ramachandran plot NA NA NA
 Favored (%)
 Allowed (%)
 Disallowed (%)

SPA single-particle analysis, StA subtomogram averaging