Table 1.
A | N | Age | Gender ratio (m:f) | VAC low load behavioral accuracy | VAC low load RT | VAC int load behavioral accuracy | VAC int load RT | VAC high load behavioral accuracy | VAC high load RT | PANSS total score | Chlorpr. Eq. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HC | 65 | 29 (5) | 53:12 | 99.4 (2.05) | 876.23 (178.77) | 96.29 (3.97) | 1008 (170.89) | 91 (11.11) | 1084.75 (193.4) | n.a. | n.a. |
SCZ | 65 | 29 (6) | 50:15 | 94.07 (8.01) | 838.28 (172.97) | 82.78 (13.18) | 955.13 (220.51) | 80 (14.52) | 984.26 (224.9) | 98.44 (29.3) | 678.5 (351.31) |
p value | 1 | 0.5 | 0.7 | <0.0001 | 0.23 | <0.0001 | 0.13 | <0.0001 | 0.008 | n.a. | n.a. |
B | N | Age | Gender ratio (m:f) | VAC low load behavioral accuracy | VAC low load RT | VAC int load behavioral accuracy | VAC int load RT | VAC high load behavioral accuracy | VAC high load RT | SPQ total score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HC | 39 | 35 (10) | 20:18 | 99.18 (2.18) | 799.64 (139.85) | 91.46 (11.65) | 951.63 (175.93) | 85.88 (15.60) | 1021.21 (184.74) | |
SIB | 39 | 35 (9) | 15:24 | 98.31 (3.61) | 864.82 (150.54) | 91.98 (9.03) | 1043.48 (154.61) | 88.65 (12.84) | 1076.22 (160.84) | 12.42 (10.79) |
p value | 1 | 0.9 | 0.2 | 0.24 | 0.07 | 0.83 | 0.02 | 0.42 | 0.18 | n.a. |
C | Age | Gender ratio (m:f) | VAC low load behavioral accuracy | VAC low load RT | VAC int load behavioral accuracy | VAC int load RT | VAC high load behavioral accuracy | VAC high load RT |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HC(SCZ) vs. HC(SIB) | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.62 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.14 | 0.07 | 0.12 |
SCZ vs. SIB | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.44 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 |
Table 1/c reports significant and non-significant differences between the SCZ-matched and the SIB-matched HC cohorts, and between SCZ and SIB groups. All p < 0.05
VAC variable attentional control, int intermediate, RT reaction time, PANSS positive and negative symptoms scale, SPQ schizotypal personality questionnaire