Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 25;45(4):622–631. doi: 10.1038/s41386-019-0577-3

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies.

TRS studies (N = 10) Non-TRS studies (N = 29) Comparisons, statistic/p-value
Year published, range 1988–2016 1974–2011
Design of double-blind randomised controlled trial, N Parallel 9, Crossover 1 Parallel 27, Crossover 2
Including child and adolescent patients, N 0 3
Total number of participants, median (range) 56 (13–267) 51 (15–423) z = −0.290, p = 0.788
Average age of participants, median (range) 38.1 (35.0–42.0) 34.0 (12.3–66.5) z = −2.890, p=0.003
Duration of double-blind intervention (weeks), median (range) 11 (6–29) 8 (4–52) z = −1.170, p = 0.258
Total number of treatment arms compared with clozapine 12 33
Breakdown of comparator arms (drug type and number of comparisons) OLZ 4, HAL 3, RIS 3, CPZ 2

CPZ 9, HAL 8, OLZ 7, RIS 5,

FLU 1, REM 1, ZIP 1, ZTP 1

χ(7) = 2.871, p = 0.897
Average dose of clozapine (mg/day), median (range) 490 (325–618) 304 (155–800) z = −2.960, p=0.002
Average dose of comparator drug in CPZEa (mg/day), median (range) 953 (385–1413) 503 (196–1642) z = −2.007, p=0.045

p-values of <0.05 are shown in bold.

CPZ chlorpromazine, CPZE chlorpromazine equivalents, FLU fluphenazine, HAL haloperidol, OLZ olanzapine, REM remoxipride, RIS risperidone, TRS treatment-resistant schizophrenia, ZIP ziprasidone, ZTP zotepine.

aCalculated using formulas reported by Andreasen et al. [24]