Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 14;11:26. doi: 10.1186/s13244-020-0835-2

Table 2.

DM and DBT findings

Findings DM (n = 318) DBT (n = 355)
Site of lesion
 Right breast 181 (56.9) 204 (57.5)
 Left breast 122 (38.4) 136 (38.3)
 Both breasts 15 (4.7) 15 (4.2)
Type of lesion
 Mass 148 (46.5) 281 (79.2)
 Asymmetry 111 (34.9)
 Architecture distortion 26 (8.2) 15 (4.2)
 Clusters of micro-calcification with no underlying mass 18 (5.7) 7 (2)
 Dense breast (BIRADS 0) 15 (4.7)
 Dilated ducts 11 (3.1)
 Asymmetrical densities 15 (4.2)
 Overlapped glandular tissue 21 (6.6) 26 (7.3)
Characters of mass
Mass margin
 Obscured on mammography and speculated on tomosynthesis 70 (47.3) 111 (39.5)
 Ill-defined 56 (37.8) 44 (15.7)
 Well-defined 22 (14.9) 126 (44.8)
Mass shape
 Irregular 67 (45.3) 130 (46.3)
 Round 44 (29.7) 92 (32.7)
 Oval 19 (12.8) 37 (13.2)
 Macrolobulated 18 (12.2) 22 (7.8)
ACR BI-RADS density
 A 15 (4.7) 15 (4.2)
 B 107 (33.7) 111 (31.3)
 C 170 (53.5) 189 (53.2)
 D 26 (8.1) 40 (11.3)

The data are represented as numbers with the corresponding percentages given in parentheses

DBT digital breast tomosynthesis, DM digital mammography, BI-RADS Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, ACR American college of radiology