Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 16;12(1):70. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12010070

Table 1.

Physicochemical properties of HAP before and after surface modification, Pip loading, coating, and conjugation.

Sample SBET (m2/g) a Total Pore Volume b (cm3/g) Mean Pore Size Diamter c (nm) Weight Loss % wt. d Weight Content % wt. e
HAP 222 ± 3 0.815 12.8 10.69 ± 0.65 -
HAP-P 143 ± 3 0.501 11.6 11.46 ± 0.40 0.77 as P
HAP-Pip7.2 108 ± 3 0.372 - 28.78 ± 2.32 -
HAP-P-Pip7.2 78 ± 3 0.356 - 31.76 ± 1.01 -
HAP-Pip-9.3 83 ± 3 0.358 10.8 29.94 ± 0.89 -
HAP-P-Pip 9.3 81 ± 3 0.358 10.4 31.30 ± 0.31 -
HAP-Pip9.3-GA 56 ± 3 0.231 11.2 31.83 ± 0.61 1.89 as GA
HAP-P-Pip9.3-GA 79 ± 3 0.354 11.7 31.72 ± 0.62 0.42 as GA
HAP-Pip9.3-GA-FA 70 ± 3 0.165 9.4 32.01 ± 1.45 0.18 as FA
HAP-P-Pip9.3-GA-FA 61 ± 3 0.294 9.3 31.89 ± 1.16 0.17 as FA

a Specific surface area measurement. b Pore volume from nitrogen adsorption measurements at 0.999 P/P°, c Mean size distribution based on the Brunauer–Emerett–Teller method, d,e Calculated from the thermogravimetric analysis.