Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 2;10(1):73. doi: 10.3390/biom10010073

Table 5.

Summary results of regression analysis for responses.

Response F-Value R2 R2adjusted R2predicted Lack of Fit Remark
Response Y1 (Particle Size)
Linear 81.84 0.9571 0.9454 0.9217 0.0198 -
2FI 68.61 0.9809 0.9666 0.9553 0.0296 -
Quadratic 820.04 0.9993 0.9981 0.9918 0.3893 Suggested
Statistically significant factors for Y1 (p < 0.05) is X1, X2 and X3
Response Y2 (zeta potential)
Linear 6.29 0.6316 0.5311 0.3324 0.0314 -
2FI 6.24 0.8238 0.6917 0.5719 0.0437 -
Quadratic 125.28 0.9840 0.9552 0.8790 0.7375 Suggested
Statistically significant factors for Y2 (p < 0.05) is X1 and X2
Response Y3 (LE)
Linear 10.89 0.7482 0.6795 0.5963 0.0197 -
2FI 4.18 0.7580 0.5765 0.2817 0.0137 -
Quadratic 68.02 0.9919 0.9773 0.8856 0.1982 Suggested
Statistically significant factors for Y3 (p < 0.05) is X1, X2 and X3
Response Y4 (LC)
Linear 0.11 0.0279 −0.2373 −0.8894 0.0030 -
2FI 0.22 0.1404 −0.5043 −2.7683 0.0022 -
Quadratic 685.94 0.9992 0.9977 0.9959 0.9064 Significant
Statistically significant factors for Y3 (p < 0.05) is X1, X2 and X3

Notes: X1 = CTAB concentration (mg/mL), X2 = CSO concentration (mg/mL), X3 = PEG concentration (mg/mL), Y1 = particle size (nm), Y2 = zeta potential (mV), Y3 = LE (%) and Y4 = LC (%).