Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 12;9(1):69. doi: 10.3390/antiox9010069

Table 3.

Antioxidant activity of Cotoneaster polyphenols in chemical models.

Analyte Radical Scavenging Activity DPPH a Reducing Power b LA-Peroxidation TBARS c
SC50 TE FRAP TE IC50 TE
µg/mL µmol/L mmol TE/g mmol Fe2+/g mol/mol mmol TE/g µg/mL µmol/L mmol TE/g
CHA 4.60 ± 0.07 G 12.97 ± 0.21 F 3.51 ± 0.05 B,C 25.68 ± 0.49 E 9.10 ± 0.18 E 9.75 ± 0.26 G 2.49 ± 0.01 A,B 6.83 ± 0.08 D 13.65 ± 0.19 G,H
PB2 2.46 ± 0.03 B 4.25 ± 0.05 B 6.57 ± 0.08 G 32.64 ± 0.80 F 18.89 ± 0.47 H 12.63 ± 0.37 H 2.56 ± 0.18 A,B 4.43 ± 0.32 B 13.28 ± 0.95 G,H
ECA 2.35 ± 0.10 B 8.08 ± 0.50 E 6.89 ± 0.41 G,H 35.79 ± 0.93 G 10.39 ± 0.27 F 13.97 ± 0.43 H 2.25 ± 0.19 A 7.73 ± 0.66 E 15.16 ± 1.29 H
PC1 2.55 ± 0.11 B 2.94 ± 0.09 A 6.34 ± 0.28 G 21.08 ± 0.80 C 18.27 ± 0.06 H 7.35 ± 0.37 D,E 2.91 ± 0.08 A,B 3.35 ± 0.09 A 11.68 ± 0.31 F,G
CAD 3.76 ± 0.11 E 12.47 ± 0.37 F 4.38 ± 0.13 D,E 22.31 ± 1.22 C,D 6.61 ± 0.36 C 7.76 ± 0.56 E,F 3.53 ± 0.28 B,C 11.90 ± 0.93 G 9.65 ± 0.76 E,F
QPH 5.09 ± -0.08 H 8.54 ± 0.14 E 3.18 ± 0.05 B 15.71 ± 0.20 B 9.37 ± 0.12 E 5.98 ± 0.13 C,D 5.00 ± 0.24 D,E,F 8.39 ± 0.40 E 6.79 ± 0.33 C,D
RT 4.44 ± 0.05 G 7.27 ± 0.08 D 3.64 ± 0.04 B,C 15.68 ± 0.62 B 9.57 ± 0.38 E 5.79 ± 0.32 C 6.01 ± 0.46 F 9.84 ± 0.75 F 5.66 ± 0.43 B,C
HP 3.42 ± 0.07 C,D,E 7.83 ± 0.16 D 4.73 ± 0.10 E,F 20.64 ± 0.02 C 9.01 ± 0.01 E 7.87 ± 0.08 E,F 5.43 ± 0.62 E,F 12.55 ± 1.28 G 6.29 ± 0.72 C,D
IQ 3.55 ± 0.08 D,E 8.12 ± 0.21 E 4.56 ± 0.10 D,E 19.69 ± 0.27 C 8.59 ± 0.06 D 7.37 ± 0.11 D,E 5.89 ± 0.09 F 13.50 ± 0.36 H 5.76 ± 0.09 B,C
QR 3.31 ± 0.03 C,D 7.39 ± 0.08 D 4.88 ± 0.05 E,F 20.26 ± 0.36 C 9.08 ± 0.16 E 7.78 ± 0.17 E,F 4.15 ± 0.10 C,D 9.04 ± 0.52 F 8.18 ± 0.20 D,E
QU 1.85 ± 0.11 A 6.31 ± 0.33 C 8.74 ± 0.07 H 46.24 ± 1.66 H 13.98 ± 0.50 G 18.10 ± 0.99 I 1.76 ± 0.06 A 5.89 ± 0.29 C 19.28 ± 0.62 I
TX 4.06 ± 0.11F 16.20 ± 0.42 G 3.99 ± 0.10 C,D 12.69 ± 0.42 B 3.18 ± 0.11 A 4.31 ± 0.19 B 8.51 ± 0.74 G 33.66 ± 2.48 J 4.00 ± 0.35 A,B
AA 3.13 ± 0.05 C 17.63 ± 0.04 H 5.17 ± 0.08 F 25.26 ± 0.15 D,E 4.45 ± 0.01 B 9.19 ± 0.01 F,G 4.59 ± 0.27 C,D,E 26.06 ± 0.80 I 7.40 ± 0.43 C,D,E
MEB 7.19 ± 0.32 I - 3.06 ± 0.14 A 10.74 ± 0.07 A - 3.76 ± 0.03 A 10.58 ± 0.32 H - 3.21 ± 0.10 A
MEZ 7.44 ± 0.03 I - 2.96 ± 0.01 A 9.42 ± 013 A - 3.15 ± 0.06 A 11.43 ± 0.71 H - 2.97 ± 0.18 A

Results are expressed as the means ± SD (n = 3). In each column, different superscript letters (A–J) indicate significant differences in the mean values (p < 0.05). Codification of the compounds is given in Figure 1 and Table 2. a Radical-scavenging efficiency expressed as effective concentration (SC50, amount of the analyte needed to decrease the initial DPPH concentration by 50%). b Ferric reducing antioxidant power. c Ability to inhibit linoleic acid peroxidation, monitored by the levels of thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS) and expressed as IC50 (inhibitory concentration). TE, Trolox® equivalent antioxidant activity. Positive controls: QU, quercetin; TX, Trolox®; AA, ascorbic acid.