Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 14;20:122. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4960-x

Table 4.

Unadjusted annual medical costs per patient by types of renal replacement therapies, in Chinese Yuan (CNY)

Overall HD Overall PD Difference (99.17%CI) P value KT (first year) KT (second year) Difference (99.17%CI) P value
Composition of total costs 3765 1237 117 41
Total annual medical costs
 Mean 94,674.7 80,734.6 13,940.1 (10,825.5–17,054.7) 0.000a 132,345.4 93,316.2 39,029.2 (22,547.6–55,510.8) 0.000a
 SD 45,034.2 32,459.0 39,385.0 31,350.6
Laboratory and diagnostic costs
 Percentage of total cost (%) 0.8 0.4 1.8 0.2
 Mean 730.1 307.7 422.4 (258.7–586.2) 0.000a 2324.9 187.3 2137.6 (1730.8–2544.5) 0.000a
 SD 2870.4 1432.1 1337.5 567.2
Non-medication treatment costs
 Percentage of total cost (%) 77.9 12.9 27.5 6.4
 Mean 73,747.8 10,377.7 63,370.1 (61,632.0–65,108.1) 0.000a 36,421.5 5996.1 30,425.4 (27,096.7–33,754.1) 0.000a
 SD 27,286.9 17,060.3 12,483.6 2969.6
Medication costs
 Percentage of total cost (%) 20.6 86.2 67.8 93.4
 Mean 19,498.0 69,633.0 −50,135.1 (−52,198.9 - -48,071.3) 0.000a 89,668.5 87,130.6 2537.9 (−12,788.2–17,863.9) 0.654a
 SD 18,190.4 25,409.8 32,098.5 30,766.0
Bed Fees
 Percentage of total cost (%) 0.4 0.3 1.7 0.0
 Mean 349.4 265.6 83.8 (−1.3–168.9) 0.009a 2235.5 0.0 2235.5 (1619.5–2851.4) 0.000a
 SD 1406.7 795.6 2480.8 0.0
Other fees
 Percentage of total cost (%) 0.4 0.2 1.3 0.0
 Mean 354.1 150.6 203.5 (116.7–290.4) 0.000a 1695.0 2.2 1692.8 (1519.3–1866.3) 0.000a
 SD 1166.2 943.2 698.5 13.2
Out-of-pocket spending
 Percentage of total cost (%) 13.0 14.3 −1.1 (−2.0 - -0.3) 0.000b 23.7 16.8 6.9 (3.2–10.8) 0.000b
 Mean 12,323.9 11,516.7 807.2 (−49.2–1663.5) 0.013a 31,378.6 15,703.6 15,675 (9026.7–22,323.3) 0.000a
 SD 11,461.9 9318.3 17,453.4 11,971.4

HD Haemodialysis, PD Peritoneal Dialysis, KT Kidney Transplantation

UEBMI, Urban Employee-based Basic Medical Insurance scheme; URBMI, Urban Resident-based Basic Medical Insurance scheme;

ap-values were based on the independent two-sample T-test; bp-values were based on the two-proportion Z-test. A Bonferroni adjustment was applied: the adjusted alpha level was 0.0083 (alpha = 0.05/6) and 99.17% Confidence Intervals (CI) were presented