Table 2.
Results show functional connectivity differences between the two groups for the regions that survived post hoc correction for multiple comparisons using the false discovery rate method (FDR-corrected p values provided). x, y, and z coordinates of each target ROI are also shown, representing the centroid of the ROI. A two-sample t-test is calculated for resting state functional connectivity between the groups for the following ROIs.
| Insomnia group (vibroacoustic stimulation vs. control group/pre vs. post) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Brain structures | FDR-corrected p | t-test | x, y, z coordinates |
| Vermis-sensorimotor | 0.009 | -4.16 | Sensorimotor superior network: (-0.073, -30.535, and 67.405) |
| Vermis-R auditory cortex | 0.0435 | -3.30 | Auditory cortex (R): (46.110, -17.401, and 6.961) |
| R thalamus-R caudate | 0.032 | +3.26 | R caudate: (13.301, 10.010, and 10.49) |
| R cerebellar hemisphere-R sensorimotor | 0.0375 | -2.97 | Sensorimotor (R) network: (56.386, -9.868, and 28.818) |
| R nucleus accumbens-R PFC | 0.0402 | -2.96 | Frontoparietal PFC (R) network: (-43.116, 33.186, and 28.244) |
| L cerebellar hemisphere-L sensorimotor | 0.0355 | -2.93 | Sensorimotor (L) network: (-55.467, -12.364, and 29.489) |