Skip to main content
. 2019 Nov 1;9(1):15–27. doi: 10.1159/000503719

Table 3.

Comparison of long-term oncological outcomes between resected patients with transitional HCC-CC, HCC, and MFCCC

Outcomes Transitional HCC-CC, mean (95% CI) HCC, mean (95% CI) p value* MFCCC, mean (95% CI) p value°
DFS, months 14.2 (0.3–28.1) 43.1 (18–68.2) 0.001 17.8 (4.4–31.2) 0.061
DFS rate, %
 1-year 46.5 (33.1–59.8) 72.8 (32.4–113.1) 0.030 59.6 (33.4–85.8) 0.074
 3-year 24.6 (18.8–30.3) 47.4 (21.8–72.9) 0.022 34.2 (17.9–50.3) 0.078
 5-year 15 (0.9–28.9) 31.6 (10.5–52.6) 0.001 20.3 (3.7–28.2) 0.275

OS, months 37.1 (22.4–51.7) 66.8 (47.4–86) 0.016 32.2 (19.8–44.4) 0.375
OS rate, %
 1-year 66.6 (54.7–78.4) 84.4 (79.4–89.4) 0.032 66.6 (40.5–92.6) 0.089
 3-year 41.5 (30.5–52.4) 65.2 (56.5–73.9) 0.017 37.8 (14.4–61.1) 0.057
 5-year 32.7 (20.5–44.8) 47.5 (37.5–57.4) 0.024 30.3 (17.7–42.7) 0.065

This table details the long-term oncological outcomes of patients who underwent liver resection. Mean DFS and OS are reported and compared between the 3 different types of primary liver malignancy.

p value*: correlation between transitional HCC-CC and HCC; p value°: correlation between transitional HCC-CC and MFCCC. Statistically significant values are expressed in bold.

DFS, disease-free survival; OS, overall survival; HCC-CC, hepatocholangiocarcinoma; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; MFCCC, mass-forming cholangiocarcinoma.