Table 1.
Approach | Exposure | Advantages | Disadvantages |
---|---|---|---|
ORBITOCRANIAL APPROACHES | |||
Lateral orbitotomy | • Lateral, superior, and inferior intraconal compartments • Orbital apex • Middle fossa and cavernous sinus |
• Minimal orbitotomy for lateral orbital lesions • Wide exposure of orbit and orbital apex |
• Enophthalmos |
Total lateral orbitotomy | • Added exposure of anterior cranial fossa in addition to lateral orbitotomy exposure | • Exposes deep apex tumors • Deep seated orbital apex lesions obviating need for craniotomy |
• Postoperative periorbital swelling • Cosmetic deformity • Enophthalmos |
Modified lateral orbitotomy | • Sphenoid wing • Orbital apex • Middle fossa and cavernous sinus |
• Good cosmetic outcome • Minimally invasive and enhanced recovery after surgery • Surgical exposure similar to pterional craniotomy but smaller opening |
• Poor anterior cranial fossa exposure • Limited exposure for treating complex vascular lesions and tumors |
Anterior medial micro-orbitotomy | • Medial intraconal compartment • Exposure medial to optic nerve |
• Easy access to lesions medial to orbit and optic nerve • Better cosmetic outcome than orbitotomy |
• Cannot address lesions at apex and superiorly located lesions • Endoscopic endonasal is useful alternative |
Trans-conjunctival | • Inferomedial and lateral intraconal compartments • Can be used for supra-orbital keyhole exposure of anterior fossa |
• Excellent cosmetic outcome • Low risk of enophthalmos |
• Poor sphenoid wing, middle fossa, and orbital apex exposure |
CRANIO-ORBITAL APPROACHES | |||
Pterional | • Versatile approach for superior and lateral orbital compartment and full exposure of orbital apex • Anterior and middle fossa |
• Excellent exposure of orbital apex • No damage to intraorbital structures, less risk of enophthalmos • Incision behind hairline |
• Requires craniotomy • Risk of temporalis atrophy |
Mini-pterional | • Similar exposure as pterional | • Smaller incision behind temporal hair line | • Smaller working corridor • Poor orbital exposure with posterior hair line |
Orbitozygomatic | • Removal of orbital roof and wall provides enhanced exposure of orbital apex and suprasellar region • Removal of zygoma provides enhanced exposure of middle fossa and infratemporal fossa |
• Enhanced exposure • Less brain retraction |
• Added operative time • Periorbital hematoma • Risk of enophthalmos |
Lateral supraorbital | • Anterior cranial fossa • Superior orbital compartment |
• Minimal disruption to temporalis muscle | • Large pterional incision behind hairline necessary to provide exposure |
Supraorbital keyhole | • Anterior cranial fossa • Superior orbital compartment |
• Minimally invasive approach through eyebrow incision | • Smaller craniotomy provides limited maneuverability of instruments • Cosmetic outcome affected by thickness of eyebrow |
Endoscopic endonasal | • Medial orbital compartment • Medial aspect of orbital apex • Opticocarotid recess |
• No visible scar • No orbitotomy or craniotomy • Low risk of enophthalmos |
• Limited exposure of orbital apex • Increased risk of CSF leak and infection • Risk of infraorbital hypoesthesia |