Table 1.
Features of different resistome analysis pipelines, in comparison to sraX.
| Bioinformatic | Standalone | SNP | Gene context | Batch | Single-step | Output | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tool | mode | analysis | analysis | mode | command | results | |
| CONTIG-ASSEMBLED SEQUENCE DATA | |||||||
| ResFinder | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Tables | Zankari et al., 2012 |
| ARG-ANNOT | No | Yes | No | No | No | Tables | Gupta et al., 2014 |
| RAST | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | Tables | Davis et al., 2016 |
| RGI | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Tables/Plots | Jia et al., 2016 |
| PointFinder | No | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Tables | Zankari et al., 2017 |
| ARGs-OAP | Yes | No | No | Yes | No | Tables/Plots | Yin et al., 2018 |
| NCBI-AMRFinder | Yes | Yes | No | Yes | Yes | Tables | Feldgarden et al., 2019 |
| sraX | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Tables/Plots | Present study |
| RAW-READS SEQUENCE DATA | |||||||
| SRST2 | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Tables | Inouye et al., 2014 |
| Mykrobe predictor | Yes | Yes | No | No | Yes | Tables | Bradley et al., 2015 |
| SSTAR | Yes | No | No | No | No | Tables | de Man and Limbago, 2016 |
| SEAR | Yes | No | No | No | Yes | Tables/Plots | Rowe et al., 2015 |
| KmerResistance | No | No | No | No | Yes | Tables | Clausen et al., 2016 |
| PATRIC | No | No | Yes | Yes | No | Tables/Plots | Antonopoulos et al., 2017 |
| ARIBA | Yes | Yes | No | No | No | Tables/Plots | Hunt et al., 2017 |
| GROOT | Yes | No | No | No | No | Tables | Rowe and Winn, 2018 |
| DeepARG | Yes | No | No | No | No | Tables/Plots | Arango-Argoty et al., 2018 |
Bold characters emphasize the functional features of the proposed tool.