Comparison 9. Prevention of UI after radical: combinations of treatments versus no treatment.

Outcome or subgroup title	No. of studies	No. of participants	Statistical method	Effect size
1 Number of incontinent men within 3 to 6 months	1		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	Totals not selected
1.1 PFMT + anal Estim + Biofeedback versus no treatment/sham treatment	1		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2 Number of incontinent men within 6 to 12 months	1		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	Totals not selected
2.1 PFMT + anal Estim + biofeedback versus no treatment	1		Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 24 hour pad test (grams of urine lost) within 3 to 6 months	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	Totals not selected
3.1 PFMT + anal Estim + Biofeedback versus no treatment/sham treatment	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4 24 hour pad test (grams of urine lost) 6 to 12 months	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	Totals not selected
4.1 PFMT + anal Estim + Biofeedback versus no treatment/sham treatment	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
5 Time until continent (months)	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	Totals not selected
5.1 PFMT + anal Estim + Biofeedback versus no treatment/sham treatment	1		Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI)	0.0 [0.0, 0.0]