Skip to main content
. 2015 Jan 20;2015(1):CD001843. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001843.pub5

Ribeiro 2008.

Methods Randomised: yes
Participants Post‐operative intervention
Included: radical prostatectomy, all men after catheter removal
Age: 51 to 76 years
Interventions Group A (36) intervention: PFMT plus BF weekly for 3 months
Group B (37) control: PFMT oral instructions only
Duration of treatment: weekly until continent or to a maximum of 3 months
Length of follow‐up: 3 months after treatment finished
Outcomes UI severity (24 hour pad test weights)
1 month (N, mean, SD): A 96 g (160) 36, B 355 (423) 37, P = 0.007
3 months: A 51 (119), 36, B 197 (269) 37
6 months: A 40 (77), 36, B 80 (176) 37
ICI‐SF score: 3 months:A 3.4 (3.7), 36, B 6.8 (5.6) 37, P = 0.022
6 months: A 2.7 (3.5), 36, B 4.3 (5.5) 37, P = 0.339
PFM Strength, A versus B: 1 month, P = 0.006; 3 months P < 0.001; 6 months P = 0.799
Quality of life (IIQ): 3 months: A 1.6 (2.7), 36, B 4.3 (6.2) 37
Notes Groups comparable at baseline before operation on age, BMI, voiding symptoms and PFMT strength
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk No description. Therefore judged to be unclear risk
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk "Randomised controlled trial"
Blinding of participants (performance bias) High risk Blinding to intervention not possible
Blinding of personnel (performance bias) High risk Blinding not possible
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No information. Therefore judged to be unclear risk
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 19: A:10 (2 refused further follow‐up, 7 post‐operative complications, 1 radiotherapy); B: 9 (6 refused further follow‐up, 2 post‐operative complications, 1 radiotherapy). No differential dropout
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Outcomes in methods reported
Financial support Low risk Grant FAPESP 2003/07656‐7 (Sao Paulo Research Foundation)
Approved by medical ethics committee Low risk "institutional review board approval"
Informed consent Low risk "All patients signed an informed consent before randomization"
ITT analysis Low risk Assumed from patient flow chart