Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 14;8:e8504. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8504

Table 2. Association of expression modules with OS/DFS in the training and validation dataset.

Modules Gene count Training dataset (n = 300) Validation dataset (n = 248)
OS DFS OS
HR 95% CI p-value HR 95% CI p-value HR 95% CI p-value
MEblack 43 0.633 0.458–0.876 0.006** 0.695 0.503–0.961 0.028* 1.486 1.04–2.121 0.029*
MEblue 404 0.992 0.721–1.363 0.959 0.991 0.721–1.362 0.955 1.158 0.809–1.657 0.422
MEbrown 342 1.586 1.149–2.189 0.005** 1.544 1.119–2.131 0.008** 1.664 1.155–2.398 0.006**
MEgreen 113 1.691 1.222–2.34 0.002** 1.609 1.163–2.226 0.004** 1.105 0.774–1.578 0.583
MEred 95 0.756 0.548–1.042 0.088 0.791 0.574–1.09 0.152 1.2 0.84–1.713 0.317
MEturquoise 1,059 1.75 1.264–2.424 0.001*** 1.66 1.198–2.299 0.002** 1.208 0.843–1.729 0.303
MEyellow 236 0.654 0.474–0.903 0.010** 0.749 0.543–1.034 0.079 1.201 0.842–1.713 0.313

Notes.

*

p ≤ 0.05.

**

p ≤ 0.01.

***

p ≤ 0.001.

Overall survival (OS), Disease-free survival (DFS). Hazard ratios (HRs), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and p-values were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis after grouped the gastric cancer patients by the median of gene level.