Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Med. 2019 Dec 6;246:112714. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112714

Table 2.

Weighted Poisson estimates predicting psychological distress among young adult (21-30 years old) participants of the UCNets Study (n=485, Wave I).

Variable Model 1
IRR (95% CI)
Model 2
IRR (95% CI)
Network Characteristics
 Number of close ties (log #) 0.93 (0.81, 1.07) 0.95 (0.83, 1.07)
 Role multiplexity 0.94 (0.79, 1.11) 0.91 (0.78, 1.06)
 Exchange multiplexity 1.01 (0.92, 1.10) 1.01 (0.93, 1.09)
 Formal participation 0.88 (0.77, 1.01) 0.91 (0.80, 1.03)
 Informal participation 1.03 (0.91, 1.17) 1.03 (0.92, 1.15)
Type of exchange (log # of…)
 Social companions 0.93 (0.77, 1.12) 0.98 (0.82, 1.18)
 Confidants 1.13 (0.98, 1.03) 1.11 (0.99, 1.24)
 Advisors 0.94 (0.82, 1.08) 0.93 (0.83, 1.04)
 Emergency helpers 1.16 (0.97, 1.40) 1.13 (0.94, 1.35)
 Receives help 0.90 (0.73, 1.09) 0.87 (0.74, 1.03)
 Difficult/demanding 1.12 (0.98, 1.28) 1.05 (0.93, 1.19)
Negative life events
 Financial difficulties 1.20 (1.06, 1.37)**
 Problem at work/school 1.31 (1.17, 1.46)***
 Break in relationship 1.17 (1.03, 1.32)*
 Health shock 1.14 (1.00, 1.28)
*

p<0.05,

**

p<0.01,

***

p<0.001

Higher scores indicate greater psychological distress.

All models are weighted and control for ego’s gender, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, relationship status, employment status, income, and household composition, as well as recruitment and survey mode.

IRR= Incident Rate Ratio; CI= Confidence Interval