Table 2.
Variable | Model 1 IRR (95% CI) |
Model 2 IRR (95% CI) |
---|---|---|
Network Characteristics | ||
Number of close ties (log #) | 0.93 (0.81, 1.07) | 0.95 (0.83, 1.07) |
Role multiplexity | 0.94 (0.79, 1.11) | 0.91 (0.78, 1.06) |
Exchange multiplexity | 1.01 (0.92, 1.10) | 1.01 (0.93, 1.09) |
Formal participation | 0.88 (0.77, 1.01) | 0.91 (0.80, 1.03) |
Informal participation | 1.03 (0.91, 1.17) | 1.03 (0.92, 1.15) |
Type of exchange (log # of…) | ||
Social companions | 0.93 (0.77, 1.12) | 0.98 (0.82, 1.18) |
Confidants | 1.13 (0.98, 1.03) | 1.11 (0.99, 1.24) |
Advisors | 0.94 (0.82, 1.08) | 0.93 (0.83, 1.04) |
Emergency helpers | 1.16 (0.97, 1.40) | 1.13 (0.94, 1.35) |
Receives help | 0.90 (0.73, 1.09) | 0.87 (0.74, 1.03) |
Difficult/demanding | 1.12 (0.98, 1.28) | 1.05 (0.93, 1.19) |
Negative life events | ||
Financial difficulties | 1.20 (1.06, 1.37)** | |
Problem at work/school | 1.31 (1.17, 1.46)*** | |
Break in relationship | 1.17 (1.03, 1.32)* | |
Health shock | 1.14 (1.00, 1.28) |
p<0.05,
p<0.01,
p<0.001
Higher scores indicate greater psychological distress.
All models are weighted and control for ego’s gender, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, relationship status, employment status, income, and household composition, as well as recruitment and survey mode.
IRR= Incident Rate Ratio; CI= Confidence Interval