Table 3.
Variable | Model 1 IRR (95% CI) |
Model 2 IRR (95% CI) |
Model 3 IRR (95% CI) |
---|---|---|---|
Network Characteristics | |||
Number of close ties (log #) | 0.89 (0.76, 1.03) | 0.90 (0.79, 1.05) | 0.90 (0.79, 1.04) |
Role Multiplexity | 0.99 (0.84, 1.17) | 0.96 (0.81, 1.13) | 0.97 (0.82, 1.14) |
Exchange Multiplexity | 1.04 (0.96, 1.12) | 1.03 (0.95, 1.12) | 1.04 (0.96, 1.12) |
Formal participation | 0.88 (0.76, 1.02) | 0.88 (0.77, 1.00) | 0.88 (0.78, 1.00) |
Informal participation | 1.00 (0.88, 1.13) | 0.97 (0.87, 1.09) | 0.97 (0.87, 1.09) |
Type of Exchange (log # of…) | |||
Social companions | 0.83 (0.73, | 0.84 (0.74, | 0.85 (0.76, 0.95)** |
Confidants | 0.97 (0.85, 1.11) | 0.95 (0.84, 1.08) | 0.95 (0.83, 1.07) |
Advisors | 1.22 (1.06, | 1.20 (1.06, | 1.18 (1.04, 1.34)** |
Emergency helpers | 0.76 (0.65, | 0.81 (0.70, | 0.81 (0.70, 0.94)** |
Receives Help | 0.96 (0.83, 1.10) | 0.96 (0.84, 1.11) | 0.97 (0.83, 1.14) |
Difficult/Demanding | 1.25 (1.12, | 1.17 (1.04, | 1.25 (1.10, 1.41)*** |
Negative Life Events | |||
Financial difficulties | 1.28 (1.11, | 1.55 (1.27, 1.90)*** | |
Problem at work/school | 1.15 (0.96, 1.37) | 1.12 (0.94, 1.32) | |
Break in relationship | 1.21 (1.04, | 1.20 (1.03, 1.39)* | |
Health shock | 1.32 (1.17, | 1.31 (1.17, 1.48)*** | |
Interaction | |||
Financial difficulties × difficult/demanding (log) | 0.77 (0.61, 0.97)* |
p<0.05,
p<0.01,
p<0.001
Higher scores indicate greater psychological distress.
All models are weighted and control for ego’s gender, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, relationship status, employment status, income, and household composition, as well as recruitment and survey mode.
IRR= Incident Rate Ratio; CI= Confidence Interval