Skip to main content
. 2001 Jan 22;2001(1):CD002060. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002060

Comparison 3. Fibreoptic vs conventional phototherapy with white light.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Duration of phototherapy (hr) 4 286 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 9.60 [4.00, 15.20]
2 Use of additional phototherapy 4 300 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.08 [1.27, 7.48]
3 Change in serum bilirubin concentration over total treatment period (% change/d) 7 381 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 4.14 [2.74, 5.55]
4 Change in serum bilirubin concentration over total treatment period (% change/hr) 7 381 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.19 [0.14, 0.24]
5 Change in serum bilirubin concentration over first 24 hours of treatment (% change/24 hr) 4 115 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.84 [‐0.19, 5.86]
6 Change in serum bilirubin concentration over first 48 hours of treatment (% change/48 hr) 3 95 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 11.72 [8.43, 15.01]
7 Use of repeat phototherapy for rebound jaundice 4 297 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.27 [0.73, 7.12]