Skip to main content
. 2001 Jan 22;2001(1):CD002060. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002060

Comparison 5. Fibreoptic vs conventional phototherapy with a combination of white and blue light.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Duration of phototherapy (hr) 1 142 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.90 [‐5.96, 11.76]
2 Use of exchange transfusion 1 44 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Use of additional phototherapy 2 186 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.4 [0.05, 3.55]
4 Change in serum bilirubin concentration over total treatment period (% change/d) 2 174 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.85 [2.05, 5.65]
5 Change in serum bilirubin concentration over total treatment period (% change/hr) 2 178 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.07 [0.00, 0.13]
6 Change in serum bilirubin concentration over first 24 hours of treatment (% change/24 hr) 2 70 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 3.30 [‐0.83, 7.42]
7 Change in serum bilirubin concentration over first 48 hours of treatment (% change/48 hr) 2 70 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 15.93 [12.49, 19.38]
8 Use of repeat phototherapy for rebound jaundice 1 142 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.0 [0.21, 4.79]